Periapical Lesions in Panoramic Radiography and CBCT Imaging—Assessment of AI’s Diagnostic Accuracy

Author:

Kazimierczak Wojciech123ORCID,Wajer Róża2,Wajer Adrian4,Kiian Veronica3,Kloska Anna5,Kazimierczak Natalia3,Janiszewska-Olszowska Joanna6ORCID,Serafin Zbigniew12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Jagiellońska 13-15, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland

2. Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital no 1 in Bydgoszcz, Marii Skłodowskiej Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland

3. Kazimierczak Private Medical Practice, Dworcowa 13/u6a, 85-009 Bydgoszcz, Poland

4. Dental Primus, Poznańska 18, 88-100 Inowrocław, Poland

5. The Faculty of Medicine, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland

6. Department of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Periapical lesions (PLs) are frequently detected in dental radiology. Accurate diagnosis of these lesions is essential for proper treatment planning. Imaging techniques such as orthopantomogram (OPG) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging are used to identify PLs. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software Diagnocat for PL detection in OPG and CBCT images. Methods: The study included 49 patients, totaling 1223 teeth. Both OPG and CBCT images were analyzed by AI software and by three experienced clinicians. All the images were obtained in one patient cohort, and findings were compared to the consensus of human readers using CBCT. The AI’s diagnostic accuracy was compared to a reference method, calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. Results: The AI’s sensitivity for OPG images was 33.33% with an F1 score of 32.73%. For CBCT images, the AI’s sensitivity was 77.78% with an F1 score of 84.00%. The AI’s specificity was over 98% for both OPG and CBCT images. Conclusions: The AI demonstrated high sensitivity and high specificity in detecting PLs in CBCT images but lower sensitivity in OPG images.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference66 articles.

1. The Global Prevalence of Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Michelon;Int. Endod. J.,2021

2. Sundqvist, G. (1976). Bacteriological Studies of Necrotic Dental Pulps. [Ph.D. Thesis, Umeå University].

3. Endodontic Periapical Lesion: An Overview on the Etiology, Diagnosis and Current Treatment Modalities;Karamifar;Eur. Endod. J.,2020

4. Classification, Diagnosis and Clinical Manifestations of Apical Periodontitis;Abbott;Endod. Topics,2004

5. Prediction of Periapical Status and Tooth Extraction;Kirkevang;Int. Endod. J.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3