Exploring the Severity Strata of Disease Activity and Repigmentation in Vitiligo Based on Validated Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Scores

Author:

van Geel Nanja1ORCID,Delbaere Liesbeth1ORCID,Mertens Laura2,Vandaele Virginie3,Depaepe Lien4,Van Causenbroeck Jérôme5,De Schepper Sofie1,Van Coile Laura1,Van Reempts Astrid1,De Vos Ann-Sophie6,Papeleu Jorien1,Hoorens Isabelle1,Wolkerstorfer Albert7,Speeckaert Reinhart1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

2. Department of Dermatology, AZ Sint-Blasius, 9200 Dendermonde, Belgium

3. Department of Dermatology, Vitaz, 9100 Sint-Niklaas, Belgium

4. Department of Dermatology, AZ Sint-Jan, 8000 Bruges, Belgium

5. Department of Dermatology, AZ Sint-Lucas, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

6. Department of Dermatology, AZ Maria Middelares, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

7. Department of Dermatology, Institute for Pigment Disorders and Infection & Immunity Institute Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background/Objectives: There is currently no guidance on how to interpret the global degrees of activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) in vitiligo. Stratification into global degrees can be completed for static evaluations (e.g., visible disease activity signs) and dynamic assessments (e.g., evolution over time). For the latter, the Vitiligo Disease Activity Score (VDAS15&60) and Vitiligo Disease Improvement Score (VDIS15&60) were recently validated. Methods: In the current study, a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) for disease activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) was evaluated for validity (construct) and reliability (inter- and intrarater) based on a photo set of 66 patients. Subsequently, the PGA activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) were used to stratify the Vitiligo Extent Score plus (VESplus), VDAS15&60 or VDIS15&60 into three global categories (slightly, moderately and much worse/improved), based on ROC analysis. Results: For the VESplus, cut-off values for the categories ‘slightly, moderately and much worse’ were >0.3%, >27.71% and >128.75% BSA (relative changes in the affected total BSA), respectively. For the categories ‘slightly, moderately and much improved’, they were >0%, >4.87% and >36.88% BSA (relative changes in the affected total BSA), respectively. The optimal cut-off values of the number of active (VDAS15) body areas were >0 areas for slightly worse, >2 areas for moderately worse and >7 for much worse. For VDIS15, the cut-off values for slightly improved and moderately improved were >0 and >1. For VDAS60 and VDIS60, the cut-off points were >0.5, >3, >9.5 and >0.5 and >1.5, respectively. The results should be interpreted with caution in patients with extensive vitiligo due to the rather limited disease extent of the included patient population (VESplus (median: 3.2%)). Conclusions: This research will aid in the development of more detailed international definitions.

Funder

Incyte Biosciences International Sarl

FWO Senior Clinical Investigator

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3