Viewing the Role of Alternate Care Service Pathways in the Emergency Care System through a Causal Loop Diagram Lens

Author:

Kumar Ashish1ORCID,Liu Zhenghong2ORCID,Ansah John Pastor3,Ng Yih Yng4ORCID,Leong Benjamin Sieu-Hon5ORCID,Matchar David Bruce1ORCID,Ong Marcus Eng Hock126ORCID,Siddiqui Fahad Javaid16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 168753, Singapore

3. Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

4. Home Team Medical Services Division, Ministry of Home Affairs, Singapore 329560, Singapore

5. Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore

6. Pre-Hospital & Emergency Research Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore

Abstract

Globally, Emergency Care Systems (ECS) are a critical resource that needs to be used judiciously as demand can easily exceed supply capacity. Sub-optimal ECS use contributes to Emergency Department (ED) crowding; this adversely affects ECS as well as system-wide service performance. Alternate Care Service Pathways (ACSPs) are innovations intended to mitigate ED crowding by re-routing less-urgent cases to sites of care other than the ED. As in other countries, policymakers in Singapore need to respond to increasing ED utilization and are evaluating the introduction of ACSPs. However, developing ACSPs is costly, entails tinkering with established critical services, and runs the risk of unintended adverse consequences. Through a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) developed in four stages, we present a view of the current Singapore ECS and the intended role of ACSPs in relieving its stress. This exercise suggests that to be successful ACSPs must change the prevailing mental model of the ED as a “one-stop shop” but should focus on integrating with primary care. The discussions stimulated by the development, critiquing, and revision of the CLD highlighted the importance of accounting for the reservations of stakeholders for changes. The CLD has enhanced shared understanding and will be used to guide quantitative simulation modeling to promote informed policy.

Funder

Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Modeling and Simulation,Control and Systems Engineering,Software

Reference50 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2023, January 26). WHO Emergency Care System Framework, Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-emergency-care-system-framework.

2. Rationing and the Role of the Emergency Department as Society’s Safety Net;Glauser;Acad. Emerg. Med.,2001

3. Royal College of Emergency Medicine (2021). Crowding and Its Consequences, Royal College of Emergency Medicine.

4. A conceptual model of emergency department crowding;Asplin;Ann. Emerg. Med.,2003

5. Morley, C., Unwin, M., Peterson, G.M., Stankovich, J., and Kinsman, L. (2018). Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLoS ONE, 13.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3