Systemic Risk in Banking against the Backdrop of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Huang Zijia1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Finance and Marketing, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify the interrelations and interdependencies of systemic risk formation in the banking sector under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis of theoretical sources resulted in the main hypotheses of this study: (H1) The number of COVID-19 cases contributes to the formation of systemic risk in the banking sector through an increase in household debt; (H2) the number of COVID-19 cases contributes to the formation of systemic risk in the banking sector through an increase in overdue loans; (H3) the number of COVID-19 cases contributes to the formation of systemic risk in the banking sector through changes in the liquidity of the capital of banking institutions; (H4) the number of fatal COVID-19 cases contributes to the formation of systemic risk in the banking sector, through an increase in household debt; (H5) the number of fatal COVID-19 cases does not have a significant impact on the formation of systemic risk in the banking sector through an increase in overdue loans; (H6) the number of fatal COVID-19 cases does not have a significant impact on the formation of systemic risk in the banking sector through changes in the liquidity of the capital of banking institutions; (H7) the COVID-19 pandemic has a significant impact on the formation of systemic risk in the banking sector with an increase in the number of cases. The research methodology was based on a quantitative approach. The methodological basis of the study was the time-series model, analyzed using a complex of econometric and economic-statistical methods. The proposed methodological approach was tested on the example of China. As a result of the conducted research, polynomial mathematical models of the selected indicators were developed, and sustainable relations and correlations between individual indicators of the systemic risk formation in the banking sector and indicators of the COVID-19 pandemic were revealed, on the basis of which Hypotheses H1, H4, H6, and H7 were proved and Hypotheses H2 and H5 were refuted. At the same time, the H3 hypothesis was proved with a remark about the need for an individual approach since the negative effect manifests itself primarily in the medium and long term. The results of the study can be used by bank managers to implement measures that prevent the formation of systemic risk. In addition, the results of this study may be of interest to subsequent studies, including in terms of forming promising directions for future research.

Funder

China Scholarship Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Modeling and Simulation,Control and Systems Engineering,Software

Reference48 articles.

1. Systemic risk: The impact of COVID-19;Rizwan;Financ. Res. Lett.,2020

2. The COVID-19 pandemic and sovereign bond risk;Ongena;N. Am. J. Econ. Finance,2021

3. Systemic risk and the COVID challenge in the European banking sector;Borri;J. Bank. Finance,2021

4. Godwin, A., Kourabas, S., and Ramsay, I. (2020). Regulation and the Global Financial Crisis, Routledge.

5. Systemic risk measures and regulatory challenges;Ellis;J. Financial Stab.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3