Affiliation:
1. School of Management, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Abstract
High-tech manufacturing enterprises, as innovative entities, are a key focus of national attention. Currently, such enterprises are facing both internal governance pressure and external institutional pressure. Unlike traditional studies that mostly use regression equations, this article uses the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method to examine how high-tech manufacturing enterprises can coordinate their internal governance mechanisms and external institutional pressures to achieve optimal innovation. This improves the complex mechanism of the multiple factors jointly explaining corporate innovation, and also helps to elucidate the nonlinear relationship between internal governance factors, external institutional factors, and corporate innovation, effectively enriching research methods and results. However, there has not been any research on the issue of enterprise innovation from the perspective of coordinating the two, which urgently needs to be addressed. This article examines how high-tech manufacturing enterprises can reconcile their internal governance mechanisms with external institutional pressures to achieve optimal innovation. The results showed that (1) a single factor cannot constitute the necessary conditions for innovation in high-tech manufacturing enterprises, but executive and shareholder governance have universality in the innovation in high-tech manufacturing enterprises; (2) in the absence of political advantages, high-tech manufacturing enterprises should focus on the coordinated development of internal governance, making board, executive, and shareholder governance the core conditions for innovative development; (3) with political advantages as the main focus and market attention as a supplement, high-tech manufacturing enterprises promote innovative development by combining executive and shareholder governance. This finding indicates a significant substitution effect between government legitimacy and board governance, and confirms that the importance of obtaining government legitimacy for high-tech manufacturing innovation is higher than market legitimacy. This article enriches the research on enterprise innovation by linking internal corporate governance with external institutional pressure, expands the research on the coordination relationship between institutional pressure and corporate governance, and has enlightening significance in revealing the collaborative path for innovation in high-tech manufacturing enterprises.
Funder
Guangdong Provincial Regional Joint Fund
Subject
Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Modeling and Simulation,Control and Systems Engineering,Software
Reference66 articles.
1. Dou, Z., Sun, Y., Zhu, J., and Zhou, Z. (2023). The Evaluation Prediction System for Urban Advanced Manufacturing Development. Systems, 11.
2. An Empirical Study of the Impact of Corpor ate Governance on Investment Expenditure in Technological innovation;Yang;Sci. Sci. Manag.,2007
3. Characteristics of Board of Directors, Innovation Input and Brand Value—An Empirical Study Based on Endogenous Perspective;Liu;Manag. Rev.,2019
4. Equity Restriction, Managerial Ownership and Enterprise Innovation Efficiency;Zhu;Nankai Bus. Rev.,2016
5. How Corporate Governance Influences Firm’s R&D Investment?—Empirical Evidence from Strategic Emerging Industries in China;Xiao;Ind. Econ. Res.,2016