Abstract
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issues related to hydrogen energy usually involve weight consideration of evaluation criteria, ambiguous evaluation information provided by experts, and lacking or incomplete evaluation information. Conventionally, the MCDM calculation method cannot effectively and simultaneously process evaluation information. To effectively address this issue, this study proposed a novel general data envelopment analysis (DEA)-based approach for MCDM issues of hydrogen energy under a fuzzy environment. The proposed general DEA-based approach integrates the typical DEA method, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (HFLTS), and the soft set to process the MCDM problems under a fuzzy environment. For the numerical verification, this study used the case of hydrogen energy key technologies ranking, as an important development reference for carbon reduction to further verify the correctness and reasonableness of the proposed approach. The calculation results were also compared with those from the typical DEA method, typical AHP/DEA method, and the fuzzy AHP/DEA method. The numerical verification results show that the proposed method can effectively process the MCDM problems under a fuzzy environment than listing different calculation methods.
Funder
National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
Subject
Information Systems and Management,Computer Networks and Communications,Modeling and Simulation,Control and Systems Engineering,Software
Reference64 articles.
1. A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development;Kumar;Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.,2017
2. A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology;Kusi-Sarpong;Int. J. Prod. Res.,2019
3. Rashidi, M., Ghodrat, M., Samali, B., Kendall, B., and Zhang, C.W. Remedial modelling of steel bridges through application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Appl. Sci., 2017. 7.
4. An integrated MCDM approach considering demands-matching for reverse logistics;Wang;J. Clean. Prod.,2019
5. Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review;Diaz-Balteiro;Eur. J. Oper. Res.,2017
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献