A Review of Lunar Communications and Antennas: Assessing Performance in the Context of Propagation and Radiation
Author:
Serria Elham1, Gadhafi Rida1ORCID, AlMaeeni Sara2, Mukhtar Husameldin1ORCID, Copiaco Abigail1ORCID, Abd-Alhameed Raed3ORCID, Lemieux Frederic4, Mansoor Wathiq1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. College of Engineering and IT, University of Dubai, Dubai 14143, United Arab Emirates 2. Mohammed Bin Rashid Space Centre, Space Robotics Laboratory, Dubai 211833, United Arab Emirates 3. Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 IDP, UK 4. School of Continuing Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20001, USA
Abstract
Over the previous two decades, a notable array of space exploration missions have been initiated with the primary aim of facilitating the return of both humans and robots from Earth to the moon. The significance of these endeavors cannot be emphasized enough as numerous entities, both public and private, from across the globe have invested substantial resources into this pursuit. Researchers have committed their efforts to addressing the challenges linked to lunar communication. Even with all of these efforts, only a few of the many suggested designs for communication and antennas on the moon have been evaluated and compared. These designs have also not been shared with the scientific community. To bridge this gap in the existing body of knowledge, this paper conducts a thorough review of lunar surface communication and the diverse antenna designs employed in lunar communication systems. This paper provides a summary of the findings presented in lunar surface communication research while also outlining the assorted challenges that impact lunar communication. Apart from various antenna designs reported in this field, based on their intended usage, two additional classifications are introduced: (a) mission-based antennas—utilized in actual lunar missions—and (b) research-based antennas—employed solely for research purposes. Given the critical need to comprehend and predict lunar conditions and antenna behaviors within those conditions, this review holds immense significance. Its relevance is particularly pronounced in light of the numerous upcoming lunar missions that have been announced.
Funder
University of Dubai
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry
Reference87 articles.
1. Dick, S. (2010). NASA 50th Anniversary Proceedings: NASA’s First 50 Years: Historical Perspectives: NASA’s First 50 Years, Historical Perspectives, US National Aeronautics & Space Administration. 2. On Eagle’s Wings: The Parkes Observatory’s Support of the Apollo 11 Mission;Sarkissian;Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.,2001 3. Mission Evaluation Team (1969). Apollo 11 Mission Report, NASA. 4. (1970). Astronautics and Aeronautics 1969 Chronology on Science, Technology, and Policy, NASA Historical Division, Office of Policy. 5. Flanegan, M., Gal-Edd, J., Anderson, L., Warner, J., Ely, T., Lee, C., Shah, B., Vaisnys, A., and Schier, J. (2008, January 12–16). NASA lunar communication and navigation architecture. Proceedings of the SpaceOps 2008 Conference, Heidelberg, Germany.
|
|