Community Participation Trajectories over the 5 Years after Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Veterans: A U.S. Veterans Affairs Model Systems Study

Author:

Vasic Stefan12ORCID,Xia Bridget23ORCID,Dini Mia E.24ORCID,Klyce Daniel W.256,Tyler Carmen M.7ORCID,Juengst Shannon B.8,Liou-Johnson Victoria910,Talley Kelli G.11,Dams-O’Connor Kristen1213,Kumar Raj G.12,Venkatesan Umesh M.1415,Engelman Brittany12,Perrin Paul B.234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA

2. Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA 23249, USA

3. School of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA

4. Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA

5. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA

6. Sheltering Arms Institute, Richmond, VA 23233, USA

7. VA Illiana Health Care System, Danville, IL 61832, USA

8. The Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX 77030, USA

9. Polytrauma Department, VA Palo Alto Healthcare Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA

10. Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA

11. Department of Rehabilitation Counseling, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA

12. Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA

13. Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA

14. Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA 19027, USA

15. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

Abstract

Background: Given the aging of the overall U.S. population, the resulting changes in healthcare needs especially among veterans, and the high prevalence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults, additional research is needed on community participation after TBI in older veterans. The current study examined predictors of community participation trajectories over the 5 years after TBI in veterans who were 55 years of age or older upon injury. Method: This study included data from 185 participants in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs TBI Model System national study who had sustained a TBI at age 55 or older and had completed at least one of each Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O) subscale scores at one or more follow-up time points (1, 2, and 5 years post-TBI). Results: PART-O Productivity, Social, and Out and About scores remained constant over time. Lower PART-O Productivity trajectories were seen among participants who were unemployed at the time of injury (p = 0.023). Lower PART-O Social trajectories were seen among participants who had a lower education level (p = 0.021), were unmarried at injury (p < 0.001), and had private insurance coverage (p < 0.033). Conclusion: These findings add to the growing body of literature on TBI and community participation by focusing on an older adult veteran population. There is an urgency to understand the needs of this group, many of whom are aging with service-connected disabilities including TBI. Veterans with characteristics identified herein as being associated with lower community participation trajectories would be prime candidates for interventions that aim to increase community and social engagement after later-life TBI.

Funder

Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference76 articles.

1. US Census Bureau (2024, March 28). The Older Population: 2020, Available online: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2023/decennial/c2020br-07.html.

2. US Census Bureau (2024, March 28). Table 2: Projected Age and Sex Composition of the Population: 2017–2060, Available online: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2017/demo/popproj/2017-summary-tables.html.

3. Arias, E., and Xu, J. (2024, March 28). United States Life Tables, 2018; National Vital Statistics Reports Vol 69, No 12, Available online: https://blogs.cdc.gov/nchs/2020/11/20/7035/.

4. Wang, J., Cidade, M., Larsen, M., Pearman, G., Schimpf, M., and Dhanireddy, P. (2019). Main Results Report, Prepared for S. A. S. (SAS) O. of S. P. and A. (OSPA) V. H. A. 2018 Survey of Veteran Enrollees’ Health and Use of Health Care.

5. US Government Accountability Office (2023, June 12). VA Health Care: Veterans’ Use of Long-Term Care Is Increasing, and VA Faces Challenges in Meeting the Demand; GAO-20-284, Available online: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-284.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3