Affiliation:
1. The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
2. Center of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment (CEE), Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
Abstract
Methanol production through carbon capture and utilization technologies offers promising alternatives to traditional natural-gas-based methods, potentially mitigating climate change impacts and improving resource efficiency. This study evaluates four methanol production pathways: CO2 hydrogenation, tri-reforming of methane, electrochemical CO2 reduction, and co-electrolysis of CO2 and water. The analysis covers 19 scenarios, combining three electricity mixes (100% Thai grid mix, 50% Thai grid mix and 50% renewable energy, and 100% renewable energy) with two hydrogen production technologies (alkaline water electrolysis and grey hydrogen). Environmental life cycle assessment results showed that most pathways perform well when using the 100% renewable energy with co-electrolysis (CE-100%) showing the most substantial reductions across all impact categories as compared conventional methanol production. Electrochemical reduction demonstrated the poorest environmental performance for all scenarios. In Thailand, implementing the CE-100% pathway could potentially yield 12.4 million tonnes of methanol annually from the cement industry’s CO2 emissions, with an estimated value of approximately USD 5.4 billion, while reducing emissions from the industrial processes and product use (IPPU) sector by 75%. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and researchers, supporting Thailand’s transition towards sustainable methanol production and broader climate goals.
Reference88 articles.
1. The rising costs of fossil-fuel extraction: An energy crisis that will not go away;Kreps;Am. J. Econ. Sociol.,2020
2. Climate change, fossil fuel prices and depletion: The rationale for a falling export tax;Day;Econ. Modell.,2017
3. Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries;Wang;Geosci. Front.,2024
4. (2024, August 02). Debating Science. The Effects of Arctic Offshore Drilling on Marine Ecosystems and Wildlife. Available online: https://websites.umass.edu/natsci397a-eross/the-effects-of-arctic-offshore-drilling-on-marine-ecosystems-and-wildlife/.
5. (2024, August 24). Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. World Oil Outlook 2045. Available online: https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/press_room/7042.htm.