Protein-Based Predictive Biomarkers to Personalize Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer—A Systematic Review of the Current Status
-
Published:2024-09-13
Issue:18
Volume:25
Page:9899
-
ISSN:1422-0067
-
Container-title:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJMS
Author:
Bedore Stacy1ORCID, van der Eerden Joshua1, Boghani Faizan1ORCID, Patel Saloni J.1, Yassin Samer1, Aguilar Karina1, Lokeshwar Vinata B.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1410 Laney Walker Blvd., Augusta, GA 30912, USA
Abstract
The clinical outcome of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is poor despite the approval of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy to improve overall survival after cystectomy. MIBC subtypes, immune, transcriptome, metabolomic signatures, and mutation burden have the potential to predict treatment response but none have been incorporated into clinical practice, as tumor heterogeneity and lineage plasticity influence their efficacy. Using the PRISMA statement, we conducted a systematic review of the literature, involving 135 studies published within the last five years, to identify studies reporting on the prognostic value of protein-based biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with MIBC. The studies were grouped based on biomarkers related to molecular subtypes, cancer stem cell, actin-cytoskeleton, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, apoptosis, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. These studies show the potential of protein-based biomarkers, especially in the spatial context, to reduce the influence of tumor heterogeneity on a biomarker’s prognostic capability. Nevertheless, currently, there is little consensus on the methodology, reagents, and the scoring systems to allow reliable assessment of the biomarkers of interest. Furthermore, the small sample size of several studies necessitates the validation of potential prognostic biomarkers in larger multicenter cohorts before their use for individualizing neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with MIBC.
Funder
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health
Reference102 articles.
1. Cancer statistics, 2023;Siegel;CA Cancer J. Clin.,2023 2. Contieri, R., Martini, A., Mertens, L.S., Giannatempo, P., Hurle, R., Witjes, J.A., Ribal, M.J., van Rhijn, B.W., and Malavaud, B. (2024). The Financial Burden of Guideline-recommended Cancer Medications for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur. Urol. Focus., in press. 3. Management of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Emerging Markets (EM): An Expert Opinion;Soares;Clin. Genitourin. Cancer,2024 4. Systematic Review of Factors Associated with the Utilization of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer;Williams;Eur. Urol. Oncol.,2019 5. Lokeshwar, S.D., Lopez, M., Sarcan, S., Aguilar, K., Morera, D.S., Shaheen, D.M., Lokeshwar, B.L., and Lokeshwar, V.B. (2022). Molecular Oncology of Bladder Cancer from Inception to Modern Perspective. Cancers, 14.
|
|