Affiliation:
1. K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Botanicheskaya 35, Moscow 127276, Russia
2. Department of Agricultural Life Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Cryopreservation is an effective option for the long-term conservation of plant genetic resources, including vegetatively propagated crops and ornamental plants, elite tree genotypes, threatened plant species with non-orthodox seeds or limited seed availability, as well as cell and root cultures useful for biotechnology. With increasing success, an arsenal of cryopreservation methods has been developed and applied to many species and material types. However, severe damage to plant material accumulating during the multi-step cryopreservation procedure often causes reduced survival and low regrowth, even when the optimized protocol is applied. The conditions at the recovery stage play a vital role in supporting material regrowth after cryopreservation and, when optimized, may shift the life-and-death balance toward a positive outcome. In this contribution, we provide an overview of the five main strategies available at the recovery stage to improve post-cryopreservation survival of in vitro plant materials and their further proliferation and development. In particular, we discuss the modification of the recovery medium composition (iron- and ammonium-free), exogenous additives to cope with oxidative stress and absorb toxic chemicals, and the modulation of medium osmotic potential. Special attention is paid to plant growth regulators used at various steps of the recovery process to induce the desired morphological response in cryopreserved tissues. Given studies on electron transport and energy provision in rewarmed materials, we discuss the effects of light-and-dark conditions and light quality. We hope that this summary provides a helpful guideline and a set of references for choosing the recovery conditions for plant species that have not been cryopreserved. We also propose that step-wise recovery may be most effective for materials sensitive to cryopreservation-induced osmotic and chemical stresses.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference260 articles.
1. Reed, B.M. (2008). Plant Cryopreservation: A Practical Guide, Springer.
2. Cryobiotechnologies: Tools for expanding long-term ex situ conservation to all plant species;Pence;Biol. Conserv.,2020
3. Pence, V.C., and Bruns, E.B. (2022). The tip of the iceberg: Cryopreservation needs for meeting the challenge of exceptional plant conservation. Plants, 11.
4. Pathirana, R., and Carimi, F. (2022). Management and utilization of plant genetic resources for a sustainable agriculture. Plants, 11.
5. Acker, J.P., Adkins, S., Alves, A., Horna, D., and Toll, J. (2017). Feasibility Study for a Safety Back-Up Cryopreservation Facility, Independent Expert Report, July 2017, Biodiversity International. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/91009.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献