Affiliation:
1. Ron and Jane Graham School of Professional Development, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
Abstract
The use of plastic products or components in medical equipment and supplies results in challenges in terms of environmental sustainability and waste management for disposable, non-recyclable, and non-biodegradable materials. Medical plastic waste includes items ranging from syringes, tubing, intravenous (IV) bags, packaging, and more. Developing biodegradable replacements to petroleum-based plastics in medical equipment has not yet become an urgent priority, but it is an important endeavor. Examining alternatives involves several key themes, including material selection, testing, validation, and regulatory approval. To date, research includes studies on biodegradable polymers, composite materials, surface modifications, bacterial cellulose, three-dimensional (3D) printing with biodegradable materials, clinical trials and testing, collaboration with industry, regulatory considerations, sustainable packaging for medical devices, and life cycle analysis. The incorporation of bio-based and biodegradable plastics in the healthcare industry holds immense potential for reducing the environmental impact of medical plastic waste. The literature suggests that researchers and industry professionals are actively working towards finding sustainable alternatives that meet the stringent requirements of the medical industry. This paper reviews the efforts made so far to develop biodegradable and sustainable alternatives to plastic in medical equipment using a meta-analysis of resources, which include relevant papers published in English until June 2024. A total of 116 documents were found and screened by three reviewers for relevance. The literature reviewed indicated that various medical uses require plastics due to their unique properties, such as having strength and flexibility; being lightweight; and being able to prevent bacterial contamination. Among the alternatives, polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), starch-based acid, and polybutyric acid (PBS) have demonstrated favourable outcomes in terms of biocompatibility, safety, and efficacy. Additionally, a set of approaches to overcome these barriers and strategies is discussed alongside potential future solutions. This review aims to catalyze discussions and actions toward a more environmentally sustainable future in the medical industry by providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state, challenges, and prospects of this domain.
Funder
Wenjun Zhang’s 2022 Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) CREATE Training Program
Dr. Lori Bradford’s Canada Research Chair in Incorporating Social and Cultural Sciences into Engineering Design
Reference91 articles.
1. Future Market Insights (2024, June 29). Market Value of Plastics Worldwide in 2023, with a Forecast for 2033 (in Billion U.S. Dollars) [Graph]. Statista, Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1060583/global-market-value-of-plastic/.
2. Degradation rates of plastics in the environment;Chamas;ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.,2020
3. An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling;Hahladakis;J. Hazard. Mater.,2018
4. Leaching behavior of fluorescent additives from microplastics and the toxicity of leachate to Chlorella vulgaris;Hongwei;Sci. Total Environ.,2019
5. Biodegradable plastics: Green hope or greenwashing?;Zhu;Mar. Pollut. Bull.,2020