Heuristic Biases as Mental Shortcuts to Investment Decision-Making: A Mediation Analysis of Risk Perception

Author:

Jain Jinesh1,Walia Nidhi2,Singla Himanshu2,Singh Simarjeet3,Sood Kiran4,Grima Simon56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sri Aurobindo College of Commerce and Management, Ludhiana 141007, Punjab, India

2. University School of Applied Management, Punjabi University, Patiala 147002, Punjab, India

3. Great Lakes Institute of Management, Gurgaon 122413, Haryana, India

4. Chitkara Business School, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, Punjab, India

5. Department of Insurance and Risk Management, Faculty of Economics Management and Accountancy, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta

6. Faculty of Business, Management and Economics, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia

Abstract

In the last two decades, research on behavioural biases has grown dramatically, fuelled by rising academic interest and zeal for publication. The present study explores the mediating role of risk perception on the relationship between heuristic biases and individual equity investors’ decision-making. The study uses Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS–SEM) to examine the survey data from 432 individual equity investors trading at the National Stock Exchange (NSE) in India. Risk perception is found to play a partial mediating role in the relationship amid overconfidence bias and investment decision-making, availability bias and investment decision-making, gamblers’ fallacy bias and investment decision-making and anchoring bias and investment decision-making, whereas it is found to play the full mediating role in the relationship between representativeness bias and investment decision-making. The result of the present study provides valuable insights into the different behavioural biases of capital market participants and other stakeholders such as equity investors, financial advisors, and policymakers. The present study solely relied on the heuristic biases of individual equity investors. However, in the real world, many other factors may impact the investment decision of individual equity investors. This has been considered a limitation of the study. The present study solely relied on the heuristic biases of individual equity investors. However, in the real world, many other factors may impact the investment decision of individual equity investors. This has been considered a limitation of the study.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Strategy and Management,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting

Reference131 articles.

1. Detecting Anchoring in Financial Markets;Andersen;Journal of Behavioral Finance,2010

2. Worldwide Research Trends on Sustainable Land Use in Agriculture;Land Use Policy,2019

3. Baker, H. Kent, and Nofsinger, John R. (2023, March 21). Psychological Biases of Investors. Financial Services Review, July. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Psychological-Biases-of-Investors-Baker-Nofsinger/0b1a81e897d3f7fc94f6030e8b7a673d8534e77e.

4. Behavioural Biases among SME Owners;Baker;International Journal of Management Practice,2018

5. Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors;Barber;The Journal of Finance,2000

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3