Harmonizing Science and Society: A Change Management Approach to Align Scientific Endeavors with Societal Needs

Author:

Hubbart Jason A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Natural Resources, Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA

Abstract

The pursuit of scientific knowledge has long been humanity’s most potent tool for comprehending the natural world and driving technological advancements. However, a persistent paradox exists within the scientific enterprise: the occasional disconnect, be it slight or complete, between scientific inquiry and tangible societal impact. This misalignment can occur from differences between what may be esoteric scientific priorities and the immediate practical needs of society. Misalignment can be problematic because many global challenges, such as climate change, infectious diseases, and resource scarcity, demand research that informs actionable strategies that more immediately benefit society. The gap between scientific outcomes and societal needs is sometimes broadened via ineffective communication, sensationalized media portrayal of research, and a lack of collaboration. This article is written to (a) articulate a method to ensure that scientific outcomes align with societal needs (in cases where alignment is important) and (b) inspire discussion about the purposefulness of scientific research. An organizational change leadership approach, rooted in business management principles, is presented that can be applied to scientific research to bridge this gap and unlock science’s transformative and tangible potential. This novel approach involves crafting a clear vision, practicing effective communication, empowering researchers, shifting success metrics, and cultivating a research enterprise culture that values societal engagement. An example application is provided to catalyze transformative change in the mining industry. By adopting a change management method, researchers can ensure their work addresses real-world needs, garners stakeholder buy-in, and enhances societal acceptance of scientific endeavors.

Funder

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Environmental Protection Agency

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference94 articles.

1. Rau, H., Goggins, G., and Fahy, F. (2023, October 17). From Invisibility to Impact: Radically Different Measures Are Needed to Capture the True Impact of Research. Available online: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences.

2. The Separation of Politics and Science;Sax;Stanf. J. Law Sci. Policy,2013

3. Decision-Making for Quality Science;Fuqua;Sci. Technol. Hum. Values,1982

4. “Reward Systems in Academe” (special issue). 60 National Forum 2 (Spring 1980): 3–27;Warner;Sci. Technol. Hum. Values,1980

5. Smith, K.E., Bandola-Gill, J., Meer, N., Stewart, E., and Watermeyer, R. (2020). Impact Agenda, Policy Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3