Affiliation:
1. School of Natural Resources, Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
Abstract
The pursuit of scientific knowledge has long been humanity’s most potent tool for comprehending the natural world and driving technological advancements. However, a persistent paradox exists within the scientific enterprise: the occasional disconnect, be it slight or complete, between scientific inquiry and tangible societal impact. This misalignment can occur from differences between what may be esoteric scientific priorities and the immediate practical needs of society. Misalignment can be problematic because many global challenges, such as climate change, infectious diseases, and resource scarcity, demand research that informs actionable strategies that more immediately benefit society. The gap between scientific outcomes and societal needs is sometimes broadened via ineffective communication, sensationalized media portrayal of research, and a lack of collaboration. This article is written to (a) articulate a method to ensure that scientific outcomes align with societal needs (in cases where alignment is important) and (b) inspire discussion about the purposefulness of scientific research. An organizational change leadership approach, rooted in business management principles, is presented that can be applied to scientific research to bridge this gap and unlock science’s transformative and tangible potential. This novel approach involves crafting a clear vision, practicing effective communication, empowering researchers, shifting success metrics, and cultivating a research enterprise culture that values societal engagement. An example application is provided to catalyze transformative change in the mining industry. By adopting a change management method, researchers can ensure their work addresses real-world needs, garners stakeholder buy-in, and enhances societal acceptance of scientific endeavors.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Environmental Protection Agency
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference94 articles.
1. Rau, H., Goggins, G., and Fahy, F. (2023, October 17). From Invisibility to Impact: Radically Different Measures Are Needed to Capture the True Impact of Research. Available online: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences.
2. The Separation of Politics and Science;Sax;Stanf. J. Law Sci. Policy,2013
3. Decision-Making for Quality Science;Fuqua;Sci. Technol. Hum. Values,1982
4. “Reward Systems in Academe” (special issue). 60 National Forum 2 (Spring 1980): 3–27;Warner;Sci. Technol. Hum. Values,1980
5. Smith, K.E., Bandola-Gill, J., Meer, N., Stewart, E., and Watermeyer, R. (2020). Impact Agenda, Policy Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献