Fertility and Insemination Characteristics of Sperm Storage Tubules in Old Thai-Native Hens
Author:
Kheawkanha Theerapat1ORCID, Chankitisakul Vibuntita12ORCID, Pimprasert Maruay1ORCID, Boonkum Wuttigrai12ORCID, Vongpralub Thevin1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand 2. Network Center for Animal Breeding and Omics Research, Faculty of Agricultural, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the effects of sperm concentration (150–250 × 106 spz/dose) and insemination frequency (once, twice, and thrice weekly) on fertility and sperm storage tubule (SST) characteristics. The SSTs were classified into five categories: namely, SSTs having an unscorable (SST1), empty (SST2), low (SST3), medium (SST4), and high (SST5) sperm count after insemination. The results showed that only insemination frequency affected the fertility rate (p < 0.05). The highest fertility was found in the thrice-weekly insemination group; however, this rate was not significantly different from that for the twice-weekly insemination group, except on day 7, while the once-weekly insemination group showed the lowest fertility rate (p < 0.05) from day four onward. On day 1, the SST characteristics showed no differences among the various insemination frequencies. On day 4, the SST2 and SST3 categories increased in the once-weekly insemination group (p < 0.05), while the SST4 and SST5 categories decreased compared to the twice- and thrice-weekly insemination groups (p < 0.05). On day 7, only the thrice-weekly insemination group maintained a level of SST5 category tubules like that measured on day 1 (p > 0.05). In summary, the insemination dose of 150 × 106 sperm was enough for fertilization, and thrice-weekly insemination was the appropriate frequency in old Thai native hens for maintaining a high sperm density in the SSTs throughout the week.
Funder
Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under The Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program
Reference43 articles.
1. Chomchuen, K., Tuntiyasawasdikul, V., Chankitisakul, V., and Boonkum, W. (2022). Genetic evaluation of body weights and egg production traits using a multi-trait animal model and selection index in Thai native synthetic chickens (Kaimook e-san2). Animals, 12. 2. Chaikuad, N., Loengbudnark, W., Chankitisakul, V., and Boonkhum, W. (2023). Genetic comparisons of body weight, average daily gain, breast circumference between slow-glowing Thai native chickens (Pradu Hang dum). Vet. Sci., 10. 3. Charoensin, S., Laopaiboon, B., Boonkum, W., Phetcharaburanin, J., Villareal, M.O., Isoda, H., and Duangjinda, M. (2021). Thai native chicken as a potential functional meat source rich in anserine, anserine/carnosine, and antioxidant substances. Animals, 11. 4. Jacob, J., Wilson, H.R., Miles, R.D., Butcher, G.D., and Mather, F.B. (2021, September 15). Factors Affecting Egg Production in Backyard Chicken. Available online: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/PS029. 5. USDA APHIS, Iowa State University (2024, February 15). US Poultry Industry Manual—Production Cycles of Egg-Type Chickens. Available online: https://www.thepoultrysite.com/articles/production-cycles-of-egg-type-chickens.
|
|