Abstract
In 2012, the Open Geospatial Consortium published GeoSPARQL defining “an RDF/OWL ontology for [spatial] information”, “SPARQL extension functions” for performing spatial operations on RDF data and “RIF rules” defining entailments to be drawn from graph pattern matching. In the 8+ years since its publication, GeoSPARQL has become the most important spatial Semantic Web standard, as judged by references to it in other Semantic Web standards and its wide use for Semantic Web data. An update to GeoSPARQL was proposed in 2019 to deliver a version 1.1 with a charter to: handle outstanding change requests and source new ones from the user community and to “better present” the standard, that is to better link all the standard’s parts and better document and exemplify elements. Expected updates included new geometry representations, alignments to other ontologies, handling of new spatial referencing systems, and new artifact presentation. This paper describes motivating change requests and actual resultant updates in the candidate version 1.1 of the standard alongside reference implementations and usage examples. We also describe the theory behind particular updates, initial implementations of many parts of the standard, and our expectations for GeoSPARQL 1.1’s use.
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Computers in Earth Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference47 articles.
1. Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT)—Version 2. W3C Recommendation, W3Chttps://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/
2. CRMgeo: Linking the CIDOC CRM to GeoSPARQL through a Spatiotemporal Refinement;Doerr,2013
3. CRMgeo: A spatiotemporal extension of CIDOC-CRM
4. OGC GeoSPARQL—A Geographic Query Language for RDF Data;Perry,2012
5. RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax;Cyganiak,2014
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献