Abstract
The aim of this study was the direct detection of feline coronavirus by real-time PCR and by three different rapid immunochromatographic (RIM) tests detecting antigens in faecal samples of shelter cats. Based on sensitivity and specificity calculated for each of the RIM tests, the utility of RIM tests was compared. Seventy faecal samples originating from shelter cats housed in quarantine were examined. Out of 70 samples analyzed by real-time PCR, 44 (62.9%) were positive. Significantly more cats (p < 0.05) tested positive than negative. Neither age nor sex of the cats played a significant role (p > 0.05) in the shedding status of the virus. The sensitivity of the RIM tests was found to be at low (<35%; RIM tests A and C) to satisfactory level (>50%, RIM test B). The number of virus particles determined by real-time RT-PCR analysis did not significantly correlate with the results detected by any of the RIM tests (p > 0.05). The results of this study indicate that the use of rapid antigen RIM tests in routine screening of FCoV shedding status in shelter cats is limited due to the occurrence of a high number of false negative results.
Reference30 articles.
1. Feline coronaviruses: Pathogenesis of feline infectious peritonitis;Tekes;Adv. Virus Res.,2016
2. A review of feline infectious peritonitis virus infection: 1963–2008
3. Managing feline coronavirus and feline infectious peritonitis in the multi-cat/shelter environment;Tasker,2018
4. A study of naturally occurring feline coronavirus infections in kittens
5. Risk of feline infectious peritonitis in cats naturally infected with feline coronavirus;Addie;Am. J. Vet. Res.,1995
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献