Affiliation:
1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Power Station Automation Technology, School of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
2. School of Electrical and Data Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
Abstract
The use of interior permanent-magnet synchronous machines (IPMSMs) is prevalent in automotive and vehicle traction applications due to their high efficiency over a wide speed range. Given the high-power-density requirements of automotive IPMSMs, it is imperative to consider the effect of nonlinearities, such as saturation and cross-coupling, on the motor model. The aforementioned nonlinearities render conventional linear motor models incapable of accurately describing the operating characteristics of the IPMSM, including the maximum torque per ampere (MTPA) trajectory, the flux-weakening (FW) trajectory, and the maximum torque per volt (MTPV) trajectory. With respect to the linear motor model, the nonlinear flux-linkage model is gradually receiving attention from researchers. This modeling method represents the nonlinear behavior of the motor through the direct establishment of a bidirectional mapping relationship between flux-linkage and current. It is capable of naturally incorporating the effects of magnetic saturation and cross-coupling factors. However, the analysis of the current trajectory optimal criteria based on this model has not yet been reported. In this paper, the optimal criteria for the MTPA and MTPV current trajectories are analyzed based on the nonlinear flux-linkage model of IPMSMs. Firstly, the nonlinear flux-linkage model of the tested IPMSM is established by the experimental calibration method. The mathematical analytical expressions of the MTPA and MTPV optimal criteria are then analyzed by constructing and solving optimal problems with different objectives. Finally, the current command table applicable to actual motor control is constructed by calculating the current command for different operating conditions according to the optimal criteria proposed in this paper. The validity and feasibility of the optimal criteria proposed in this paper are verified through experimental tests on different operating conditions.
Reference43 articles.
1. (2024, April 11). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2022, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-04/us-ghg-inventory-2024-main-text_04-18-2024.pdf.
2. Aiso, K., and Akatsu, K. (2022). Performance Comparison of High-Speed Motors for Electric Vehicle. World Electr. Veh. J., 13.
3. Comparative Study of Interior Permanent Magnet, Induction, and Switched Reluctance Motor Drives for EV and HEV Applications;Yang;IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif.,2015
4. Quantitative comparison of electromagnetic performance of electrical machines for HEVs/EVs;Zhu;CES Trans. Electr. Mach. Syst.,2017
5. Krishnan, R. Permanent magnet synchronous and brushless DC motor drives; CRC press: 2017.