Mechanisms of Waterflood Inefficiency: Analysis of Geological, Petrophysical and Reservoir History, a Field Case Study of FWU (East Section)
Author:
Morgan Anthony12ORCID, Ampomah William1, Grigg Reid1, Wang Sai1ORCID, Czarnota Robert1
Affiliation:
1. Petroleum Recovery and Research Center, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 2. Petroleum and Natural Gas Department, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani P.O. Box 214, Ghana
Abstract
The petroleum reservoir represents a complex heterogeneous system that requires thorough characterization prior to the implementation of any incremental recovery technique. One of the most commonly utilized and successful secondary recovery techniques is waterflooding. However, a lack of sufficient investigation into the inherent behavior and characteristics of the reservoir formation in situ can result in failure or suboptimal performance of waterflood operations. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the geological history, static and dynamic reservoir characteristics, and petrophysical data is essential for analyzing the mechanisms and causes of waterflood inefficiency and failure. In this study, waterflood inefficiency was observed in the Morrow B reservoir located in the Farnsworth Unit, situated in the northwestern shelf of the Anadarko Basin, Texas. To assess the potential mechanisms behind the inefficiency of waterflooding in the east half, geological, petrophysical, and reservoir engineering data, along with historical information, were integrated, reviewed, and analyzed. The integration and analysis of these datasets revealed that several factors contributed to the waterflood inefficiency. Firstly, the presence of abundant dispersed authigenic clays within the reservoir, worsened by low reservoir quality and high heterogeneity, led to unfavorable conditions for waterflood operations. The use of freshwater for flooding exacerbated the adverse effects of sensitive and migratory clays, further hampering the effectiveness of the waterflood. In addition to these factors, several reservoir engineering issues played a significant role in the inefficiency of waterflooding. These issues included inadequate perforation strategies due to the absence of detailed hydraulic flow units (HFUs) and rock typing, random placement of injectors, and uncontrolled injected fresh water. These external controlling parameters further contributed to the overall inefficiencies observed during waterflood operations in the east half of the reservoir. A detailed understanding of the mechanistic factors of inefficient waterflood operation will provide adequate insights into the development of the improved recovery technique for the field.
Funder
U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory
Reference60 articles.
1. Ahmed, T. (2019). Reservoir Engineering Handbook, Gulf Professional Publishing. [5th ed.]. 2. Morgan, A., Akanji, L., Udoh, T., Mohammed, S., Anumah, P., and Kyeremeh, S.J. (2020, January 11–13). Fractional Flow Behaviour and Transport Mechanisms During Low salinity and Protein Enzyme Bio-surfactant EOR Flooding. Proceedings of the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Virtual. 3. Baker, R., Dieva, R., Jobling, R., and Lok, C. (2016, January 11–13). The myths of waterfloods, eor floods and how to optimize real injection schemes. Proceedings of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, OK, USA. 4. Skauge, A. (2013, January 16–18). Low Salinity Flooding—A Critical Review. Proceedings of the IOR 2013—17th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Saint Petersburg, Russia. 5. Mwangi, P. (2010). An Experimental Study of Surfactant Enhanced Waterflooding. [Master’s Thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College].
|
|