Short-Term Risk Estimation and Treatment Planning for Cardiovascular Disease Patients after First Diagnostic Catheterizations with Machine Learning Models
-
Published:2023-04-21
Issue:8
Volume:13
Page:5191
-
ISSN:2076-3417
-
Container-title:Applied Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences
Author:
Ye Guochang12, Gamage Peshala Thibbotuwawa2, Balasubramanian Vignesh2, Li John K.-J.3, Subasi Ersoy4, Subasi Munevver Mine5, Kaya Mehmet2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Doll Cellular Inc., 420–880 Douglas ST, Victoria, BC V8W 2B7, Canada 2. Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, 150 W University Blvd, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, 599 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA 4. College of Aeronautics, Florida Institute of Technology, 150 W University Blvd, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA 5. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, 150 W University Blvd, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death. CVD symptoms may develop within a short-term after diagnostic catheterizations and lead to life-threatening situations. This study is the first to apply machine learning (ML) methods to predict subsequent adverse cardiovascular events/treatments for patients within 90 days after their first diagnostic catheterizations. Patients (6539) without previously diagnosed CVD were selected from the DukeCath dataset. Ten ML methods were used. Three medical outcomes, varied cardiovascular-related scenarios, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatments, and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) treatments, were targeted individually. With patient medical history, vital measurements, laboratory results, and the number of diseased vessels, the random forest classifier (RFC) performed best in predicting combined cardiovascular scenarios, including CABG, PCI, valve surgery (VS), stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI), achieving accuracy: 88.17%, sensitivity: 89.72%, specificity: 86.98%, area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC): 91.68%. The gradient boosting classifier (GBC) performed best in predicting the PCI and CABG treatments (PCI treatments: accuracy: 89.21%, sensitivity: 90.20%, specificity: 88.74%, AUROC: 94.16%; CABG treatments: accuracy: 93.86%, sensitivity: 77.57%, specificity: 96.23%, AUROC: 96.47%). Our results show that the ML applications effectively identify high-risk patients, can provide diagnostic assistance in cardiovascular treatment planning, and improve outcomes in cardiovascular medicine.
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference34 articles.
1. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2021 Update;Virani;Circulation,2021 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics (2019). About Multiple Cause of Death, 1999–2019, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC WONDER Online Database Website. 3. Kern, M.J., Sorajja, P., and Lim, M.J. (2015). Cardiac Catheterization Handbook, Elsevier Health Sciences. 4. Manda, Y.R., and Baradhi, K.M. (2019). StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing. 5. Survey of Machine Learning Algorithms for Disease Diagnostic;Fatima;J. Intell. Learn. Syst. Appl.,2017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|