Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods

Author:

Sánchez-Peralta Luisa F.12ORCID,Glover Ben3ORCID,Saratxaga Cristina L.4ORCID,Ortega-Morán Juan Francisco12ORCID,Nazarian Scarlet3ORCID,Picón Artzai45ORCID,Pagador J. Blas12ORCID,Sánchez-Margallo Francisco M.1267ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, E-10071 Cáceres, Spain

2. AI4polypNET Thematic Network, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain

3. Imperial College London, London SW7 2BU, UK

4. TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), E-48160 Derio, Spain

5. Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of the Basque Country, E-48013 Bilbao, Spain

6. RICORS-TERAV Network, ISCIII, E-28029 Madrid, Spain

7. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, E-28029 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading death causes worldwide, but, fortunately, early detection highly increases survival rates, with the adenoma detection rate being one surrogate marker for colonoscopy quality. Artificial intelligence and deep learning methods have been applied with great success to improve polyp detection and localization and, therefore, the adenoma detection rate. In this regard, a comparison with clinical experts is required to prove the added value of the systems. Nevertheless, there is no standardized comparison in a laboratory setting before their clinical validation. The ClinExpPICCOLO comprises 65 unedited endoscopic images that represent the clinical setting. They include white light imaging and narrow band imaging, with one third of the images containing a lesion but, differently to another public datasets, the lesion does not appear well-centered in the image. Together with the dataset, an expert clinical performance baseline has been established with the performance of 146 gastroenterologists, who were required to locate the lesions in the selected images. Results shows statistically significant differences between experience groups. Expert gastroenterologists’ accuracy was 77.74, while sensitivity and specificity were 86.47 and 74.33, respectively. These values can be established as minimum values for a DL method before performing a clinical trial in the hospital setting.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3