Analysis of Real-Time Face-Verification Methods for Surveillance Applications
-
Published:2023-01-18
Issue:2
Volume:9
Page:21
-
ISSN:2313-433X
-
Container-title:Journal of Imaging
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Imaging
Author:
Perez-Montes Filiberto1, Olivares-Mercado Jesus1ORCID, Sanchez-Perez Gabriel1, Benitez-Garcia Gibran2ORCID, Prudente-Tixteco Lidia1ORCID, Lopez-Garcia Osvaldo1
Affiliation:
1. Instituto Politecnico Nacional, ESIME Culhuacan, Mexico City 04440, Mexico 2. Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan
Abstract
In the last decade, face-recognition and -verification methods based on deep learning have increasingly used deeper and more complex architectures to obtain state-of-the-art (SOTA) accuracy. Hence, these architectures are limited to powerful devices that can handle heavy computational resources. Conversely, lightweight and efficient methods have recently been proposed to achieve real-time performance on limited devices and embedded systems. However, real-time face-verification methods struggle with problems usually solved by their heavy counterparts—for example, illumination changes, occlusions, face rotation, and distance to the subject. These challenges are strongly related to surveillance applications that deal with low-resolution face images under unconstrained conditions. Therefore, this paper compares three SOTA real-time face-verification methods for coping with specific problems in surveillance applications. To this end, we created an evaluation subset from two available datasets consisting of 3000 face images presenting face rotation and low-resolution problems. We defined five groups of face rotation with five levels of resolutions that can appear in common surveillance scenarios. With our evaluation subset, we methodically evaluated the face-verification accuracy of MobileFaceNet, EfficientNet-B0, and GhostNet. Furthermore, we also evaluated them with conventional datasets, such as Cross-Pose LFW and QMUL-SurvFace. When examining the experimental results of the three mentioned datasets, we found that EfficientNet-B0 could deal with both surveillance problems, but MobileFaceNet was better at handling extreme face rotation over 80 degrees.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference46 articles.
1. de Freitas Pereira, T., Schmidli, D., Linghu, Y., Zhang, X., Marcel, S., and Günther, M. (2022). Eight Years of Face Recognition Research: Reproducibility, Achievements and Open Issues. arXiv. 2. Sundaram, M., and Mani, A. (2016). Face Recognition: Demystification of Multifarious Aspect in Evaluation Metrics, Intech. 3. Zhang, A., Lipton, Z.C., Li, M., and Smola, A.J. (2021). Dive into deep learning. arXiv. 4. Boutros, F., Damer, N., and Kuijper, A. (2022). QuantFace: Towards lightweight face recognition by synthetic data low-bit quantization. arXiv. 5. Taigman, Y., Yang, M., Ranzato, M., and Wolf, L. (2014, January 23–28). Deepface: Closing the gap to human-level performance in face verification. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|