Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Image Detection of Colonic Polyps vs. Resected Polyps

Author:

Abraham Adriel1,Jose Rejath1ORCID,Ahmad Jawad1,Joshi Jai1,Jacob Thomas1,Khalid Aziz-ur-rahman1,Ali Hassam2,Patel Pratik3ORCID,Singh Jaspreet3,Toma Milan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. New York Institute of Technology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA

2. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA

3. Department of Gastroenterology, Northwell Mather Hospital, Port Jefferson, NY 11777, USA

Abstract

(1) Background: Colon polyps are common protrusions in the colon’s lumen, with potential risks of developing colorectal cancer. Early detection and intervention of these polyps are vital for reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates. This research aims to evaluate and compare the performance of three machine learning image classification models’ performance in detecting and classifying colon polyps. (2) Methods: The performance of three machine learning image classification models, Google Teachable Machine (GTM), Roboflow3 (RF3), and You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8n), in the detection and classification of colon polyps was evaluated using the testing split for each model. The external validity of the test was analyzed using 90 images that were not used to test, train, or validate the model. The study used a dataset of colonoscopy images of normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps. The study assessed the models’ ability to correctly classify the images into their respective classes using precision, recall, and F1 score generated from confusion matrix analysis and performance graphs. (3) Results: All three models successfully distinguished between normal colon, polyps, and resected polyps in colonoscopy images. GTM achieved the highest accuracies: 0.99, with consistent precision, recall, and F1 scores of 1.00 for the ‘normal’ class, 0.97–1.00 for ‘polyps’, and 0.97–1.00 for ‘resected polyps’. While GTM exclusively classified images into these three categories, both YOLOv8n and RF3 were able to detect and specify the location of normal colonic tissue, polyps, and resected polyps, with YOLOv8n and RF3 achieving overall accuracies of 0.84 and 0.87, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Machine learning, particularly models like GTM, shows promising results in ensuring comprehensive detection of polyps during colonoscopies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Reference29 articles.

1. Meseeha, M., and Attia, M. (2023). Colon Polyps, StatPearls Publishing.

2. Polyp Size Measurement at CT Colonography: What Do We Know and What Do We Need to Know?;Summers;Radiology,2010

3. Prevalence of Adenomas and Colorectal Cancer in Average Risk Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis;Heitman;Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.,2009

4. Concise update on colorectal cancer epidemiology;Mattiuzzi;Ann. Transl. Med.,2019

5. Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?;Bonnington;World J. Gastroenterol.,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3