Image Quality Assessment Tool for Conventional and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisitions
-
Published:2024-05-09
Issue:5
Volume:10
Page:115
-
ISSN:2313-433X
-
Container-title:Journal of Imaging
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Imaging
Author:
Nikiforaki Katerina1, Karatzanis Ioannis1ORCID, Dovrou Aikaterini12ORCID, Bobowicz Maciej3ORCID, Gwozdziewicz Katarzyna3ORCID, Díaz Oliver45ORCID, Tsiknakis Manolis16ORCID, Fotiadis Dimitrios I.7ORCID, Lekadir Karim48, Marias Kostas16ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece 2. School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece 3. 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland 4. Departament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain 5. Computer Vision Center, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain 6. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece 7. Biomedical Research Institute, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 45500 Ioannina, Greece 8. Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain
Abstract
Image quality assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data is an important factor not only for conventional diagnosis and protocol optimization but also for fairness, trustworthiness, and robustness of artificial intelligence (AI) applications, especially on large heterogeneous datasets. Information on image quality in multi-centric studies is important to complement the contribution profile from each data node along with quantity information, especially when large variability is expected, and certain acceptance criteria apply. The main goal of this work was to present a tool enabling users to assess image quality based on both subjective criteria as well as objective image quality metrics used to support the decision on image quality based on evidence. The evaluation can be performed on both conventional and dynamic MRI acquisition protocols, while the latter is also checked longitudinally across dynamic series. The assessment provides an overall image quality score and information on the types of artifacts and degrading factors as well as a number of objective metrics for automated evaluation across series (BRISQUE score, Total Variation, PSNR, SSIM, FSIM, MS-SSIM). Moreover, the user can define specific regions of interest (ROIs) to calculate the regional signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), thus individualizing the quality output to specific use cases, such as tissue-specific contrast or regional noise quantification.
Reference24 articles.
1. Lekadir, K., Feragen, A., Fofanah, A.J., Frangi, A.F., Buyx, A., Emelie, A., Lara, A., Porras, A.R., Chan, A.-W., and Navarro, A. (2023). FUTURE-AI: International Consensus Guideline for Trustworthy and Deployable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. arXiv. 2. (2023, May 05). TCIA. Available online: https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/. 3. (2023, May 05). EUCAIM. Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/cancer-imaging. 4. Muthusivarajan, R., Celaya, A., Yung, J.P., Viswanath, S., Marcus, D.S., Chung, C., and Fuentes, D. (2021). Correlation between Image Quality Metrics of Magnetic Resonance Images and the Neural Network Segmentation Accuracy. arXiv. 5. Deep Learning to Automate Reference-Free Image Quality Assessment of Whole-Heart MR Images;Piccini;Radiol. Artif. Intell.,2020
|
|