Image Quality Assessment Tool for Conventional and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisitions

Author:

Nikiforaki Katerina1,Karatzanis Ioannis1ORCID,Dovrou Aikaterini12ORCID,Bobowicz Maciej3ORCID,Gwozdziewicz Katarzyna3ORCID,Díaz Oliver45ORCID,Tsiknakis Manolis16ORCID,Fotiadis Dimitrios I.7ORCID,Lekadir Karim48,Marias Kostas16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece

2. School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece

3. 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland

4. Departament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain

5. Computer Vision Center, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain

6. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece

7. Biomedical Research Institute, Foundation for Research and Technology—Hellas (FORTH), 45500 Ioannina, Greece

8. Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Image quality assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data is an important factor not only for conventional diagnosis and protocol optimization but also for fairness, trustworthiness, and robustness of artificial intelligence (AI) applications, especially on large heterogeneous datasets. Information on image quality in multi-centric studies is important to complement the contribution profile from each data node along with quantity information, especially when large variability is expected, and certain acceptance criteria apply. The main goal of this work was to present a tool enabling users to assess image quality based on both subjective criteria as well as objective image quality metrics used to support the decision on image quality based on evidence. The evaluation can be performed on both conventional and dynamic MRI acquisition protocols, while the latter is also checked longitudinally across dynamic series. The assessment provides an overall image quality score and information on the types of artifacts and degrading factors as well as a number of objective metrics for automated evaluation across series (BRISQUE score, Total Variation, PSNR, SSIM, FSIM, MS-SSIM). Moreover, the user can define specific regions of interest (ROIs) to calculate the regional signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), thus individualizing the quality output to specific use cases, such as tissue-specific contrast or regional noise quantification.

Funder

European Union

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference24 articles.

1. Lekadir, K., Feragen, A., Fofanah, A.J., Frangi, A.F., Buyx, A., Emelie, A., Lara, A., Porras, A.R., Chan, A.-W., and Navarro, A. (2023). FUTURE-AI: International Consensus Guideline for Trustworthy and Deployable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. arXiv.

2. (2023, May 05). TCIA. Available online: https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/.

3. (2023, May 05). EUCAIM. Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/cancer-imaging.

4. Muthusivarajan, R., Celaya, A., Yung, J.P., Viswanath, S., Marcus, D.S., Chung, C., and Fuentes, D. (2021). Correlation between Image Quality Metrics of Magnetic Resonance Images and the Neural Network Segmentation Accuracy. arXiv.

5. Deep Learning to Automate Reference-Free Image Quality Assessment of Whole-Heart MR Images;Piccini;Radiol. Artif. Intell.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3