Analyzing Data Modalities for Cattle Weight Estimation Using Deep Learning Models

Author:

Afridi Hina12,Ullah Mohib1ORCID,Nordbø Øyvind3,Hoff Solvei Cottis4,Furre Siri4,Larsgard Anne Guro2,Cheikh Faouzi Alaya1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway

2. Geno SA, Storhamargata 44, 2317 Hamar, Norway

3. Norsvin SA, Storhamargata 44, 2317 Hamar, Norway

4. TYR SA, Storhamargata 44, 2317 Hamar, Norway

Abstract

We investigate the impact of different data modalities for cattle weight estimation. For this purpose, we collect and present our own cattle dataset representing the data modalities: RGB, depth, combined RGB and depth, segmentation, and combined segmentation and depth information. We explore a recent vision-transformer-based zero-shot model proposed by Meta AI Research for producing the segmentation data modality and for extracting the cattle-only region from the images. For experimental analysis, we consider three baseline deep learning models. The objective is to assess how the integration of diverse data sources influences the accuracy and robustness of the deep learning models considering four different performance metrics: mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and R-squared (R2). We explore the synergies and challenges associated with each modality and their combined use in enhancing the precision of cattle weight prediction. Through comprehensive experimentation and evaluation, we aim to provide insights into the effectiveness of different data modalities in improving the performance of established deep learning models, facilitating informed decision-making for precision livestock management systems.

Funder

Research Council of Norway

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference35 articles.

1. Comparison and reliability of techniques to estimate live cattle body weight;Wangchuk;J. Appl. Anim. Res.,2018

2. Understanding farmers’ behavior and their decision-making process in the context of cattle diseases: A review of theories and approaches;Biesheuvel;Front. Vet. Sci.,2021

3. Blokhuis, H.J., Veissier, I., Miele, M., and Jones, B. (2019). Sustainability Certification Schemes in the Agricultural and Natural Resource Sectors, Taylor & Francis Group.

4. Stajnko, D., Vindiš, P., Janžekovič, M., and Brus, M. (2010). New Trends in Technologies: Control, Management, Computational Intelligence and Network Systems, Intech Open.

5. Intelligent perception for cattle monitoring: A review for cattle identification, body condition score evaluation, and weight estimation;Qiao;Comput. Electron. Agric.,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. SMT: Self-supervised Approach for Multiple Animal Detection and Tracking;IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3