Affiliation:
1. HQ Diagnostic Imaging Department, Dubai Health, Dubai 2727, United Arab Emirates
2. College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University, Dubai Health, Dubai 2727, United Arab Emirates
3. Medical Imaging Department, Dubai Hospital, Dubai Health, Dubai 2727, United Arab Emirates
Abstract
Screening mammography is considered to be the most effective means for the early detection of breast cancer. However, epidemiological studies suggest that longitudinal exposure to screening mammography may raise breast cancer radiation-induced risk, which begs the need for optimization and internal auditing. The present work aims to establish a comprehensive well-structured Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) system that can be confidently used to highlight healthcare centers in need of urgent action, as well as cases exceeding the dose notification level. Screening mammographies from a total of 2048 women who underwent screening mammography at seven different healthcare centers were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The typical DRL for each healthcare center was established and defined as per (A) bilateral image view (left craniocaudal (LCC), right craniocaudal (RCC), left mediolateral oblique (LMLO), and right mediolateral oblique (RMLO)) and (B) structured compressed breast thickness (CBT) criteria. Following this, the local DRL value was established per the bilateral image views for each CBT group. Screening mammography data from a total of 8877 images were used to build this comprehensive DRL system (LCC: 2163, RCC: 2206, LMLO: 2288, and RMLO: 2220). CBTs were classified into eight groups of <20 mm, 20–29 mm, 30–39 mm, 40–49 mm, 50–59 mm, 60–69 mm, 70–79 mm, 80–89 mm, and 90–110 mm. Using the Kruskal–Wallis test, significant dose differences were observed between all seven healthcare centers offering screening mammography. The local DRL values defined per bilateral image views for the CBT group 60–69 mm were (1.24 LCC, 1.23 RCC, 1.34 LMLO, and 1.32 RMLO) mGy. The local DRL defined per bilateral image view for a specific CBT highlighted at least one healthcare center in need of optimization. Such comprehensive DRL system is efficient, easy to use, and very clinically effective.
Reference34 articles.
1. Assessment of dose to glandular tissue of patients undergoing mammography examinations;Pwamang;J. Radiat. Ther.,2016
2. Breast cancer screening in the United Arab Emirates: Is it time to call for a screening at an earlier age?;Alrawi;J. Cancer Prev. Curr. Res.,2018
3. Reflections on screening mammography and the early detection of breast cancer;Narod;Curr. Oncol.,2014
4. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening;Yaffe;Radiology,2011
5. Radiation doses and risks in breast cancer imaging;Hendrick;Radiology,2021