Consideration of Sustainability in Projects: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Analysis

Author:

Magano José12ORCID,Silvius Gilbert345ORCID,Nogueira Teresa67ORCID,Hamed Farzad3

Affiliation:

1. Research Center in Business and Economics (CICEE), Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa, Rua Sta. Marta 47, 5.º Andar, 1150-293 Lisboa, Portugal

2. Higher Institute of Business Sciences and Tourism (ISCET), 4050-180 Porto, Portugal

3. Research Centre, Apeldoorn Campus, Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences, Brinklaan 268, 7311 JD Apeldoorn, The Netherlands

4. Institute for People & Business, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Padualaan, 101, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands

5. Department of Applied Information Systems, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park Bunting Road Campus, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa

6. School of Engineering, Polytechnic Institute of Porto (P. Porto), 4249-015 Porto, Portugal

7. Center for Innovation in Engineering and Industrial Technology (CIETI), P. Porto, R. Dr. António Benardino de Almeida, 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal

Abstract

The consideration of sustainability in projects is one of the most critical global trends in project management today, as projects are instrumental in the sustainable development of organisations and society. In the growing literature on this topic, most studies take a qualitative approach, often based on single case studies, and quantitative studies are underrepresented. To address these limitations, this study aims to examine the extent to which different aspects and perspectives of sustainability are integrated into projects by reporting a quantitative analysis of the consideration of sustainability in 134 projects. The analysis used the Sustainable Project Management Maturity Model SPM3 to analyse the level at which sustainability was considered in the projects. The results show that, on average, sustainability is considered at a reactive level, with the desired levels of consideration on average one level higher (proactive). When considering the different triple bottom line perspectives, the economic perspective scores highest, followed by the social and environmental perspectives. The study also shows that building-related projects score higher on sustainability considerations than other project types, as do larger projects. Limitations of the study include its European focus, the relatively small sample size, and the fact that the data was collected in different locations over a four-year period, which raises the possibility of subjective differences in the evaluation of individual projects. Nevertheless, the study can be seen as a ‘wake-up call’ for project practitioners, who need to be more proactive in this regard if projects are to be the route to sustainability.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference47 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3