Economics in Marine Spatial Planning: A Review of Issues in British Columbia and Similar Jurisdictions
-
Published:2024-01-31
Issue:3
Volume:16
Page:1210
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Issifu Ibrahim1ORCID, Dahmouni Ilyass1ORCID, García-Lorenzo Iria12ORCID, Sumaila U. Rashid1
Affiliation:
1. Fisheries Economics Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 2. Environmental and Natural Resources Economics Group (ERENEA)–Economics and Business for Society (ECOBAS), Department of Applied Economics, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
Abstract
Recently, there has been a rapid increase in the use of Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) worldwide, partly due to the continued loss of marine biodiversity and habitat. The sustainability of marine resources is threatened in all regions of the world by major events such as climate change, marine pollution, and overfishing, as well as illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing both on the high seas and in country waters. Here, we present a comprehensive review and analysis of how economic information has been applied and used to inform decisions about MSP in British Columbia (BC), Canada, and other similar jurisdictions around the world. This focus for the paper was selected because important gaps remain in the literature in terms of incorporating economic questions into MSP. We first present different definitions of MSP, and then we extract useful lessons from MSP regimes with well-tested decision support tools (DSTs) and use this to guide MSP implementation in BC. Finally, we present and discuss case studies from Australia, South Africa, and Belgium. Our review suggests that applying economic information to support the design and implementation of MSPs would lead to better decisions. This in turn would foster livelihoods, attract finance, increase buy-in, and advance United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 14: Life Below Water, thereby achieving Infinity Fish, i.e., ensuring that ocean benefits flow to humanity forever.
Funder
Xunta de Galicia’s Regional, the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation and the ERDF Spanish Ministry of Universities European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference96 articles.
1. Winners and losers in a world where the high seas is closed to fishing;Sumaila;Sci. Rep.,2015 2. Waldron, A., Adams, V., Allan, J., Arnell, A., Asner, G., Atkinson, S., Baccini, A., Baillie, J., Balmford, A., and Beau, J.A. (2023, April 01). Protecting 30% of the Planet for Nature: Costs, Benefits and Economic Implications. Campaign for Nature. Available online: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/326470/Waldron_Report_FINAL_sml.pdf?sequence=1. 3. The World Bank (2023, March 22). Applying Economic Analysis to Marine Spatial Planning. Available online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099515006062210102/pdf/P1750970bba3a60940831205d770baece51.pdf. 4. Day, J. (2016). Big, Bold and Blue: Lessons from Australia’s Marine Protected Areas, CSIRO Publishing. 5. Fostering adaptive marine aquaculture through procedural innovation in marine spatial planning;Craig;Mar. Policy,2019
|
|