Mastectomy Skin Flap Perfusion Assessment Prior to Breast Reconstruction: A Narrative Review

Author:

Orădan Alex Victor123ORCID,Georgescu Alexandru Valentin12ORCID,Ilie-Ene Alexandru45,Corpodean Alma Andreea2,Juncan Teodora Paula6,Muntean Maximilian Vlad13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery—Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

2. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, 400066 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, “Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță” Institute of Oncology, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

4. Department of Surgery, First Surgical Clinic, Emergency County Hospital, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

5. Department of Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

6. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, First Surgical Clinic, Emergency County Hospital, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Abstract

Background: Predicting the viability of the skin flaps after mastectomy is of high importance and significance in immediate breast reconstruction. Numerous methods have been used and are readily available. This review aims to describe and compare the current preferred perfusion assessment tools. Methods: Four major scientific databases—Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus—were consulted to retrieve reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, experimental studies, and case reports focused on skin flap perfusion assessment following mastectomy. English-language articles published within the last 10 years were included. The most recent search was conducted on 31 July 2024. Results: A summary focused on the relevant information of all included studies was drafted, and the results of the studies have been synthetized and compared. A total of 58 studies have been included in this review. Conclusion: Indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A) is the preferred and most-used method of evaluating perfusion, especially in high-risk patients, while new technologies show promising results and might be of great interest in the future. Perfusion assessment tools complement and should not replace clinical evaluation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3