Affiliation:
1. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G2Elab, F-38000 Grenoble, France
2. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, F-38000 Grenoble, France
Abstract
The energy transition is a multidisciplinary challenge that warrants solutions that are robust and sustainable. Energy flexibility, one of the key pillars of the energy transition, is an umbrella term that covers multiple innovative solutions implemented at all levels of the electric grid to ensure power quality standards, amongst other objectives. Low-tech, on the other hand, emphasizes designing, producing, and sustainably implementing solutions. Therefore, considering the multidisciplinary nature of energy transition and the existing energy flexibility solutions, the purpose of this research work is multilateral: first, it presents the concept of low-tech and its associated mechanisms; then, it addresses the misconceptions and similarities that low-tech might have with other innovation approaches; and finally, it provides an assessment of existing flexibility solutions using low-tech as a tool. The result of this assessment is presented qualitatively and indicates that indirect energy flexibility solutions rank higher on a low-tech scale relative to supply-side energy flexibility solutions and energy storage flexibility solutions.
Funder
ANR
eco-SESA program
Observatory of Transition for Energy
French government under the PIA, IRT Nanoelec
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference155 articles.
1. Energy transitions after COP21 and 22;Balibar;Comptes Rendus Phys.,2017
2. United Nations (2015). The Paris Agreement, United Nations.
3. IRENA (2022, September 21). Energy Transition. Available online: https://www.irena.org/energytransition.
4. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem;Carayannis;Int. J. Technol. Manag.,2009
5. Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation;Heidingsfelder;J. Des. Econ. Innov. She Ji,2019