Nanoparticles in Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review of Current Advances and Future Directions in Tissue Engineering
-
Published:2024-08-23
Issue:9
Volume:15
Page:241
-
ISSN:2079-4983
-
Container-title:Journal of Functional Biomaterials
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JFB
Author:
Farjaminejad Samira1, Farjaminejad Rosana1ORCID, Garcia-Godoy Franklin2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. School of Health and Psychological Sciences, Department of Health Services Research and Management, City University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK 2. Department of Bioscience Research, Bioscience Research Center, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
Abstract
The rising demand for effective bone regeneration has underscored the limitations of traditional methods like autografts and allografts, including donor site morbidity and insufficient biological signaling. This review examines nanoparticles (NPs) in tissue engineering (TE) to address these challenges, evaluating polymers, metals, ceramics, and composites for their potential to enhance osteogenesis and angiogenesis by mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM) nanostructure. The methods involved synthesizing and characterizing nanoparticle-based scaffoldsand integrating hydroxyapatite (HAp) with polymers to enhance mechanical properties and osteogenic potential. The results showed that these NPs significantly promote cell growth, differentiation, and bone formation, with carbon-based NPs like graphene and carbon nanotubes showing promise. NPs offer versatile, biocompatible, and customizable scaffolds that enhance drug delivery and support bone repair. Despite promising results, challenges with cytotoxicity, biodistribution, and immune responses remain. Addressing these issues through surface modifications and biocompatible molecules can improve the biocompatibility and efficacy of nanomaterials. Future research should focus on long-term in vivo studies to assess the safety and efficacy of NP-based scaffolds and explore synergistic effects with other bioactive molecules or growth factors. This review underscores the transformative potential of NPs in advancing BTE and calls for further research to optimize these technologies for clinical applications.
Reference198 articles.
1. Tsuchida, S., and Nakayama, T. (2023). Recent Clinical Treatment and Basic Research on the Alveolar Bone. Biomedicines, 11. 2. New biograft solution, growth factors and bone regenerative approaches in neurosurgery, dentistry, and orthopedics: A review;Montemurro;Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.,2023 3. Saul, D., Menger, M.M., Ehnert, S., Nüssler, A.K., Histing, T., and Laschke, M.W. (2023). Bone Healing Gone Wrong: Pathological Fracture Healing and Non-Unions—Overview of Basic and Clinical Aspects and Systematic Review of Risk Factors. Bioengineering, 10. 4. Feroz, S., Cathro, P., Ivanovski, S., and Muhammad, N. (2023). Biomimetic bone grafts and substitutes: A review of recent advancements and applications. Biomed. Eng. Adv., 6. 5. Georgeanu, V.A., Gingu, O., Antoniac, I.V., and Manolea, H.O. (2023). Current Options and Future Perspectives on Bone Graft and Biomaterials Substitutes for Bone Repair, from Clinical Needs to Advanced Biomaterials Research. Appl. Sci., 13.
|
|