Affiliation:
1. Dental School, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
2. Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, “Federico II” University of Naples, 80100 Naples, Italy
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess and compare the marginal bone loss between two different categories of implants (Winsix, Biosafin, Ancona, Italy) having the same diameter and belonging to the Torque Type® (TT®) line, in the internal hexagon version (TTi, Group A) and in the external hexagon configuration (TTx, Group B). Patients with one or more straight implants (insertion parallel to the occlusal plane) in the molar and premolar regions in association with tooth extraction at least 4 months prior to implant insertion, who have a fixture diameter of 3.8 mm, who followed up for at least 6 years, and whose radiographic records were available were enrolled in this study. Depending on implant connections (externally or internally), the sample was divided into groups A and B. For externally connected implants (66), the marginal resorption was 1.1 ± 0.17 mm. The subgroup of single and bridge implants showed no statistically significant differences with a marginal bone resorption of 1.07 ± 0.15 mm and 1.1 ± 0.17 mm, respectively. Internally connected implants (69) showed an overall marginal resorption of 0.91 ± 0.17 mm, while the subgroup of single and bridge implants showed resorption of 0.90 ± 0.19 mm and 0.90 ± 0.17 mm, respectively, with no statistically significant differences. According to the obtained results, internally connected implants showed less marginal bone resorption than externally connected implants.
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference64 articles.
1. Functional implant prosthodontic score of a one-year prospective study on three different connections for single-implant restorations;Carboncini;J. Osseointegr.,2018
2. Osseointegration and its experimental background;J. Prosthet. Dent.,1983
3. Rehabilitation and osseointegration in clinical reality;Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant.,2003
4. How to consider implant-prosthetic rehabilitation in elderly patients: A narrative review;Polizzi;J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents,2021
5. Experimental analysis of the influence of cortical bone layers and bone quantity on implant primary stability;Romeo;J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents,2020
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献