Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chemomechanical Carie Removal Agents—A Systematic Integrative Review

Author:

Janvier Adélaïde1,Maziere Marie2ORCID,Rodrigues Célia F.345,Lobo Ana Paula1ORCID,Rompante Paulo2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dental Sciences, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS—CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal

2. UNIPRO—Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS—CESPU), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal

3. Associate Laboratory i4HB—Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, University Institute of Health Sciences—CESPU, Avenida Central de Gandra 1317, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal

4. UCIBIO—Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Translational Toxicology Research Laboratory, University Institute of Health Sciences (1H—TOXRUN, IUCS—CESPU), 4585-116 Porto, Portugal

5. LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Background: Dental caries is the most common oral disease in the world. When treatable, the drilling method continues to be used. This technique has its disadvantages because it is invasive and nonspecific. Chemomechanical carious tissue removal agents (CCRAs) such as Carisolv™ or Papacarie® are non-invasive products that allow for the specific elimination of infected dentin. On the other hand, cariogenic bacteria are largely responsible for the initiation and development of lesions. Objectives: The aim is to analyze whether CCRAs have a relevant antimicrobial effect on cariogenic bacteria. Methods: A bibliographic search strategy was carried out in online databases using PRISMA 2020. The evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of CCRAs was carried out through the analysis of the reduction in CFUs of cariogenic bacteria, and the presence of bacterial deposits, TVC, SVC and LVC by comparison with conventional drilling methods. Results: The results showed that the percentage of reduction in TVC, SVC and LVC for each agent is mostly high, but not significantly different from mechanical methods. The best results were found with CCRAs when compared to polymeric drills. The results also showed that there is a lack of methodological standardization. Conclusions: CCRAs have been shown to have a relevant antimicrobial effect on cariogenic bacteria; however, more studies need to be carried out using standardized methodologies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference41 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO) (2022). Global Oral Health Status Report: Towards Universal Health Coverage for Oral Health by 2030, WHO.

2. Dental Caries: A Disease Which Needs Attention;Mathur;Indian J. Pediatr.,2018

3. Catunda, R.Q., Altabtbaei, K., Flores-Mir, C., and Febbraio, M. (2023). Pre-Treatment Oral Microbiome Analysis and Salivary Stephan Curve Kinetics in White Spot Lesion Development in Orthodontic Patients Wearing Fixed Appliances. A Pilot Study. BMC Oral Health, 23.

4. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Minimal Invasive Methods Versus Conventional Methods for Caries Removal in Primary Molars;Elfeel;Cureus,2023

5. Chemomechanical Caries Removal Methods: A Literature Review;Maashi;Saudi Dent. J.,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3