Affiliation:
1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu 42415, Republic of Korea
2. Healthcare Review and Assessment Committee, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju 26465, Republic of Korea
3. Quality Assessment Department, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju 26465, Republic of Korea
Abstract
Previous results regarding the association between types of β-blockers and outcomes in patients on hemodialysis (HD) were inconsistent. Our study aimed to evaluate patient survival according to the type of β-blockers administered using a large sample of patients with maintenance HD. Our study included patients on maintenance HD patients from a national HD quality assessment program (n = 54,132). We divided included patients into four groups based on their use and type; Group 1 included patients without a prescription of β-blockers, Group 2 included patients with a prescription of dialyzable and cardioselective β-blockers, Group 3 included patients with a prescription of non-dialyzable and non-cardioselective β-blockers, and Group 4 included patients with prescription of non-dialyzable and cardioselective β-blockers. The number of patients in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 34,514, 2789, 15,808, and 1021, respectively. The 5-year survival rates in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 69.3%, 66.0%, 68.8%, and 69.2%, respectively. Univariate Cox regression analyses showed the hazard ratios to be 1.10 (95% CI, 1.04–1.17) in Group 2 and 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02–1.09) in Group 3 compared to Group 1. However, multivariate Cox regression analyses did not show statistical significance among the four groups. Our study showed that there was no significant difference in patient survival based on the use or types of β-blockers.
Funder
Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning
Ministry of Education
Korea government
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference23 articles.
1. ESRD Registry Committee: Korean Society of Nephrology (2023, August 30). Current Renal Replacement Therapy in Korea. Available online: https://ksn.or.kr/bbs/index.php?code=report.
2. US Renal Data System (2023, August 30). USRDS 2020 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases: Bethesda, MD, USA. Available online: https://adr.usrds.org/2020.
3. Excess mortality among patients on dialysis: Comparison with the general population in Korea;Choi;Kidney Res. Clin. Pract.,2014
4. K/DOQI Workgroup (2005). K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis., 45, S1–S153.
5. Executive summary of the KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease;Cheung;Kidney Int.,2021
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献