Quantitative Insights and Visualization of Antimicrobial Tolerance in Mixed-Species Biofilms

Author:

Dittmer Mandy1,Brill Florian H. H.2ORCID,Kampe Andreas2,Geffken Maria3,Rembe Julian-Dario4ORCID,Moll Raphael5,Alio Ifey5,Streit Wolfgang R.5ORCID,Debus Eike Sebastian1,Smeets Ralf6ORCID,Stuermer Ewa Klara1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Vascular Medicine, Translational Research, University Heart Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

2. Dr. Brill + Partner GmbH, Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, 22339 Hamburg, Germany

3. Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany

4. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

5. Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University Hamburg, 20148 Hamburg, Germany

6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

Abstract

Biofilms are a major problem in hard-to-heal wounds. Moreover, they are composed of different species and are often tolerant to antimicrobial agents. At the same time, interspecific synergy and/or competition occurs when some bacterial species clash. For this reason, the tolerance of two dual-species wound biofilm models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus or Enterococcus faecium against antimicrobials and antimicrobial dressings were analyzed quantitatively and by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The results were compared to findings with planktonic bacteria. Octenidine-dihydrochloride/phenoxyethanol and polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) irrigation solutions showed a significant, albeit delayed reduction in biofilm bacteria, while the PHMB dressing was not able to induce this effect. However, the cadexomer-iodine dressing caused a sustained reduction in and killed almost all bacteria down to 102 cfu/mL within 6 days compared to the control (1010 cfu/mL). By means of CLSM in untreated human biofilm models, it became evident that P. aeruginosa dominates over E. faecium and S. aureus. Additionally, P. aeruginosa appeared as a vast layer at the bottom of the samples, while S. aureus formed grape-like clusters. In the second model, the distribution was even clearer. Only a few E. faecium were visible, in contrast to the vast layer of P. aeruginosa. It seems that the different species avoid each other and seek their respective niches. These mixed-species biofilm models showed that efficacy and tolerance to antimicrobial substances are nearly species-independent. Their frequent application appears to be important. The bacterial wound biofilm remains a challenge in treatment and requires new, combined therapy options.

Funder

Initiative Chronic Wounds

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference53 articles.

1. Clinical investigation of biofilm in non-healing wounds by high resolution microscopy techniques;Hurlow;J. Wound Care,2016

2. The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published data;Malone;J. Wound Care,2017

3. Microscopy visualisation confirms multi-species biofilms are ubiquitous in diabetic foot ulcers;Johani;Int. Wound J.,2017

4. Kalan, L., Schultz, G., Malone, M., Bjarnsholt, T., Townsend, E., Cheong, J.Z.A., Gibson, A., Radzieta, M., Fritz, B., and Ousey, K. (2023). Slough: Composition, analysis and effect on healing. Wound Int., 1–44. Available online: https://www.linkforwoundhealing.info/en/scientific-content/2023/international-wound-infection-institute-slough-composition.

5. A crucial role for exopolysaccharide modification in bacterial biofilm formation, immune evasion, and virulence;Vuong;J. Biol. Chem.,2004

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3