Why Certain Repurposed Drugs Are Unlikely to Be Effective Antivirals to Treat SARS-CoV-2 Infections

Author:

Hurwitz Selwyn J.1,De Ramyani1,LeCher Julia C.1ORCID,Downs-Bowen Jessica A.1ORCID,Goh Shu Ling1,Zandi Keivan1,McBrayer Tamara1,Amblard Franck1,Patel Dharmeshkumar1ORCID,Kohler James J.1,Bhasin Manoj2,Dobosh Brian S.2,Sukhatme Vikas3,Tirouvanziam Rabindra M.2ORCID,Schinazi Raymond F.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for ViroScience and Cure, Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, 1760 Haygood Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

2. Center for Cystic Fibrosis & Airways Disease Research, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy & Immunology, Cystic Fibrosis and Sleep, Emory University and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, 2015 Uppergate Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

3. Morningside Center for Innovative and Affordable Medicine, Departments of Medicine and Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

Abstract

Most repurposed drugs have proved ineffective for treating COVID-19. We evaluated median effective and toxic concentrations (EC50, CC50) of 49 drugs, mostly from previous clinical trials, in Vero cells. Ratios of reported unbound peak plasma concentrations, (Cmax)/EC50, were used to predict the potential in vivo efficacy. The 20 drugs with the highest ratios were retested in human Calu-3 and Caco-2 cells, and their CC50 was determined in an expanded panel of cell lines. Many of the 20 drugs with the highest ratios were inactive in human Calu-3 and Caco-2 cells. Antivirals effective in controlled clinical trials had unbound Cmax/EC50 ≥ 6.8 in Calu-3 or Caco-2 cells. EC50 of nucleoside analogs were cell dependent. This approach and earlier availability of more relevant cultures could have reduced the number of unwarranted clinical trials.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference208 articles.

1. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023, November 28). Overview of COVID-19 Vaccines, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/overview-COVID-19-vaccines.html.

2. Comprehensive literature review on COVID-19 vaccines and role of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the pandemic;Yap;Ther. Adv. Vaccines Immunother.,2021

3. Fan, Y.J., Chan, K.H., and Hung, I.F. (2021). Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis of different vaccines at phase 3. Vaccines, 9.

4. Narayanan, A., Narwal, M., Majowicz, S.A., Varricchio, C., Toner, S.A., Ballatore, C., Brancale, A., Murakami, K.S., and Jose, J. (2022). Identification of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors targeting Mpro and PLpro using in-cell-protease assay. Commun. Biol., 5.

5. Remdesivir against COVID-19 and other viral diseases;Malin;Clin. Microbiol. Rev.,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3