Perspectives for Generative AI-Assisted Art Therapy for Melanoma Patients
Author:
Jütte Lennart1ORCID, Wang Ning1, Steven Martin1, Roth Bernhard12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Hannover Centre for Optical Technologies, Leibniz University Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany 2. Cluster of Excellence PhoenixD, Leibniz University Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany
Abstract
Digital technologies are making their mark in medicine, and especially also in art therapy, offering innovative therapeutic interventions for patients, including those with melanoma skin cancer. However, the integration of novel technologies, such as AI-generated art, brings along ethical, psychological, and technical challenges that are viewed differently among therapists. We aim to gauge art therapists’ views on the ethical, application, and challenge facets of utilizing AI-generated art from medical images in therapy. The focus is on assessing its applicability and limitations for melanoma patients. Art therapists were surveyed via a questionnaire focusing on their experience, digital tool familiarity, and views on AI in therapy, encompassing ethics, benefits, challenges, and applicability for melanoma. Art therapists have already implemented digital technologies and acknowledged potential therapeutic benefits of creating personalized artworks with generative artificial intelligence. Attention needs to be given to technological hurdles and the necessity for supplementary interventions. Views on the method’s adaptability varied, underscoring a need for tailored, patient-focused applications. Art therapists are welcoming AI-generated art as a promising creative therapeutic tool and acknowledge potential therapeutic benefits. There are ethical, technical, and psychological challenges that must be addressed for application in therapeutic sessions. Therapists should navigate AI integration with sensitivity, adhering to ethical norms around consent and privacy. Future studies should show the therapeutic benefit in practice with emphasis on equipping therapists to manage the technical complexities effectively. Furthermore, it is important to ensure that patients can influence the AI output, allowing for creative moments in the process.
Funder
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme iToBoS Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Reference50 articles.
1. Online art therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic;Miller;Int. J. Art Ther.,2020 2. Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., and Salvendy, G. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Painting Interactive Experience Discovers Possibilities for Emotional Healing in the Post-pandemic Era. HCI International 2023 Posters, Springer Nature. 3. Hadjipanayi, C., Banakou, D., and Michael-Grigoriou, D. (2023). Art as therapy in virtual reality: A scoping review. Front. Virtual Real., 4. 4. Bernhaupt, R., Mueller, F., Verweij, D., Andres, J., McGrenere, J., Cockburn, A., Avellino, I., Goguey, A., Bjørn, P., and Zhao, S. (2020). AI-generated vs. Human Artworks. A Perception Bias Towards Artificial Intelligence?. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Proceedings of the CHI‘20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 April 2020, ACM. 5. Cancer statistics, 2022;Siegel;CA Cancer J. Clin.,2022
|
|