Abstract
This paper reviews actual sustainability assessments in the construction sector to define whether and how a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) is applied and interpreted in this sector today. This industry has large shares in global energy (33%), raw material consumption (40%) and solid waste generation (40%). Simultaneously, it drives the economy and provides jobs. The LCSA is a method to identify environmental, social and economic impacts of products/services along their life cycles. The results of this study showed a mismatch between sectoral emissions and the number of LCSA-based impact evaluations. It was found that only 11% of papers reviewed assessed all three sustainability pillars. The economic and especially the social pillars were partly neglected. In Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs), 100% made use of Global Warming Potential (GWP) but only 30% assessed more than five indicators in total. In Life Cycle Costing (LCC), there were a variety of costs assessed. Depreciation and lifetime were mainly neglected. We found that 42% made use of Net Present Value (NPV), while over 50% assessed individual indicators. For the Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA), the focus was on the production stage; even the system boundaries were defined as cradle-to-use and -grave. Future approaches are relevant but there is no need to innovate: a proposal for a LCSA approach is made.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Subject
Process Chemistry and Technology,Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous),Bioengineering
Reference120 articles.
1. How Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is aiding Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in results interpretation
2. EU Energy-Intensive Industries’ 2050 Masterplan Becoming Climate-Neutral While Staying Competitivehttps://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/38402
3. The 10 Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns (10YFP). Interim Progress Report Prepared by the 10YFP Secretariat on Behalf of the 10YFP Board for the High-Level Political Forumhttps://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1444HLPF_10YFP2.pdf
4. Integrating triple bottom line input–output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings
5. A modeling framework to evaluate sustainability of building construction based on LCSA
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献