Chemical and Antioxidant Properties of Solvent and Enzyme-Assisted Extracts of Fucus vesiculosus and Porphyra dioica
-
Published:2024-07-18
Issue:7
Volume:22
Page:319
-
ISSN:1660-3397
-
Container-title:Marine Drugs
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Marine Drugs
Author:
Nova Paulo12ORCID, Cunha Sara A.1ORCID, Costa-Pinto Ana R.23ORCID, Gomes Ana Maria1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. CBQF—Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal 2. i3S—Instituto de Investigacão e Inovacão em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal 3. IPATIMUP—Instituto de Patologia Molecular e Imunologia da Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
Abstract
Extraction strategies impact the efficiency and nature of extracted compounds. This work assessed the chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of ethanolic, hydroethanolic, and aqueous versus enzyme-assisted extracts (isolated or with the sequential use of alcalase®, cellulase®, and viscozyme®) of the macroalgae Fucus vesiculosus (brown, Phaeophyceae) and Porphyra dioica (red, Rhodophyta. For both macroalgae, enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) was the most efficient process compared to solvent-assisted extraction (SAE), independent of solvent. Fucus vesiculosus extraction yields were higher for EAE than for SAE (27.4% to 32.2% and 8.2% to 30.0%, respectively). Total phenolics content (TPC) was at least 10-fold higher in EAE extracts (229.2 to 311.3 GAE/gextract) than in SAE (4.34 to 19.6 GAE/gextract) counterparts and correlated well with antioxidant capacity (ABTS and ORAC methods), with EAE achieving values up to 8- and 2.6-fold higher than those achieved by SAE, respectively. Porphyra dioica followed F. vesiculosus’s trend for extraction yields (37.5% to 51.6% for EAE and 5.7% to 35.1% for SAE), TPC, although of a lower magnitude, (0.77 to 8.95 GAE/gextract for SE and 9.37 to 14.73 GAE/gextract for EAE), and antioxidant capacity. Aqueous extracts registered the highest DPPH values for both macroalgae, with 2.3 µmol TE/gextract and 13.3 µmol TE/gextract for F. vesiculosus and P. dioica, respectively. EAE was a more efficient process in the extraction of soluble protein and reducing sugars in comparison to SAE. Furthermore, an improved effect of enzyme-assisted combinations was observed for almost all analyzed parameters. This study shows the promising application of enzyme-assisted extraction for the extraction of valuable compounds from F. vesiculosus and P.dioica, making them excellent functional ingredients for a wide range of health and food industrial applications.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia individual FCT PhD research
Reference45 articles.
1. Alves, C., Silva, J., Pinteus, S., Gaspar, H., Alpoim, M.C., Botana, L.M., and Pedrosa, R. (2018). From marine origin to therapeutics: The antitumor potential of marine algae-derived compounds. Front. Pharmacol., 9. 2. Bioactive peptides derived from marine sources: Biological and functional properties;Cunha;Trends Food Sci. Technol.,2022 3. Health benefits and bioavailability of marine resources components that contribute to health—What’s new?;Nova;Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.,2020 4. Kim, S.-K. (2015). Marine Functional Foods. Springer Handbook of Marine Biotechnology, Springer. 5. Khalifa, S.A.M., Elias, N., Farag, M.A., Chen, L., Saeed, A., Hegazy, M.E.F., Moustafa, M.S., El-Wahed, A.A., Al-Mousawi, S.M., and Musharraf, S.G. (2019). Marine natural products: A source of novel anticancer drugs. Mar. Drugs, 17.
|
|