Exploring Simplicity Bias in 1D Dynamical Systems

Author:

Dingle Kamal12ORCID,Alaskandarani Mohammad1,Hamzi Boumediene34,Louis Ard A.2

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Applied Mathematics and Bioinformatics, Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Hawally 32093, Kuwait

2. Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK

3. Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Caltech, CA 91125, USA

4. The Alan Turing Institute, London NW1 2DB, UK

Abstract

Arguments inspired by algorithmic information theory predict an inverse relation between the probability and complexity of output patterns in a wide range of input–output maps. This phenomenon is known as simplicity bias. By viewing the parameters of dynamical systems as inputs, and the resulting (digitised) trajectories as outputs, we study simplicity bias in the logistic map, Gauss map, sine map, Bernoulli map, and tent map. We find that the logistic map, Gauss map, and sine map all exhibit simplicity bias upon sampling of map initial values and parameter values, but the Bernoulli map and tent map do not. The simplicity bias upper bound on the output pattern probability is used to make a priori predictions regarding the probability of output patterns. In some cases, the predictions are surprisingly accurate, given that almost no details of the underlying dynamical systems are assumed. More generally, we argue that studying probability–complexity relationships may be a useful tool when studying patterns in dynamical systems.

Funder

Gulf University for Science and Technology

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference77 articles.

1. Input–output maps are strongly biased towards simple outputs;Dingle;Nat. Commun.,2018

2. Generic predictions of output probability based on complexities of inputs and outputs;Dingle;Sci. Rep.,2020

3. A preliminary report on a general theory of inductive inference (revision of report v-131);Solomonoff;Contract AF,1960

4. Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information;Kolmogorov;Probl. Inf. Transm.,1965

5. A theory of program size formally identical to information theory;Chaitin;J. ACM,1975

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3