Evaluation of Tactile and Thermophysiological Comfort in Reusable Surgical Gowns Compared to Disposable Gowns

Author:

Georgievska Magdalena1,Nigusse Abreha Bayrau1ORCID,Malengier Benny1ORCID,Tahir Hasan Riaz1ORCID,Harding Charlotte2ORCID,Derbew Tiku Sufiyan1,Van Langenhove Lieva1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium

2. Department of Product Development, Faculty of Design Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium

Abstract

Though the transition from disposable to reusable surgical gowns holds substantial promise, successful implementation faces challenges. This study investigated tactile and thermophysiological comfort in surgical reusable gowns, comparing them with their disposable counterparts. Parameters such as surface roughness, compression, heat flux, and material rigidity were tested using a Fabric Touch Tester. Additionally, the water vapour permeability and static charge of the gowns were assessed. Thermophysiological comfort of the gowns was evaluated by measuring the temperature and relative humidity (RH) on test subjects during wear trials where they were engaged in an activity that mimics a surgeon’s performance. Skin temperature was monitored using iButton sensors and a thermal camera, and the impact on heart rate during the task was analysed. Following each test, participants provided subjective feedback through a questionnaire. The results indicated that reusable gowns boasted a smoother texture, translating to reduced friction on the skin and better heat transfer compared to the disposable fabrics, as indicated using FTT. They also exhibited higher water vapour permeability compared to their disposable counterparts. The wear trials revealed minimal differences in comfort between disposable and reusable gowns. While performing the activity, an increase in body temperature led to decreased RH, yet this rise did not adversely affect subject comfort, as validated using heart rate and questionnaire survey data. From a comfort point of view, switching from disposable to reusable gowns would not have drawbacks, meaning hospitals should be able to switch provided logistics and costs can be managed.

Funder

Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship, TETRA funds

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference22 articles.

1. Sun, G. (2011). Textiles for Hygiene and Infection Control, Elsevier.

2. A Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Perioperative Textiles: Sustainability State-of-the-Art;Overcash;Anesth. Analg.,2012

3. Performance Evaluation of Newly Designed Disposable Surgical Gowns;Altay;Text. Appar.,2023

4. Möhring, U., Schwabe, D., and Hanus, S. (2011). Handbook of Medical Textiles, Elsevier.

5. Thermal comfort properties of nonwoven fabrics used in surgical gowns;Eryuruk;IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3