Emotional Regulation Mechanisms of University Students in Group Work Situations

Author:

Vega-Ramírez Lilyan1ORCID,Reyno-Freundt Alda2,Hederich-Martínez Christian3ORCID,Ávalos-Ramos Mª Alejandra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. EDUCAPHYS Research Group, Department of General and Specific Didactics, Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain

2. Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, University of Playa Ancha, Valparaíso 08007, Chile

3. Department of Education, Faculty of Social and Business Studies, University Autonoma of Manizales, Manizales 170003, Colombia

Abstract

Universities are active agents of social change through knowledge, providing citizens with the necessary abilities to face professional challenges. This work aims to evaluate and analyse the adaptation of emotional regulation in learning situations of group work in virtual and hybrid (virtual and presential) environments, of a group of students of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences belonging to a Chilean university and a Spanish university. Method: A total of 107 students from a Chilean university and a Spanish university, all of them enrolled in the degree in Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, participated in the study. The instrument used was the Adaptative Instrument for Regulation of Emotions questionnaire. Results: The analysis of the data shows that there are some significant differences (p ≤ 0.05), between the groups of students who worked virtually and those who worked in hybrid situations, in the aspects related to personal motivations (learn from my classmates, not to disappoint my working group, and enjoying the experience of working in a group). The students who worked online resolved conflicts mainly through individual regulation mechanisms with significant differences in relation to the students who worked in hybrid mode. No significant differences were found in the socioemotional challenges or in the balance of the metacognitive experience. Conclusion: The group that worked in hybrid learning valued group purposes over personal purposes and used the social regulation mechanism over individual regulation in conflict resolution. On the other hand, the group that worked virtually valued group and personal purposes equally and used the mechanism of individual regulation and social regulation to solve difficulties. Differences between students who worked in virtual and hybrid environments may be due to greater social interaction and group dynamics in hybrid environments, as well as differences in culture and access to resources and technology.

Funder

Redes-I3CE Program for Research in University Teaching, Institute of Educational Sciences of the University of Alicante

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference47 articles.

1. El papel de las universidades en la sociedad 5.0;Arias;Rev. Sist.,2020

2. Visión de la universidad del Siglo XXI: Dialéctica de la misión universitaria en una era de cambios;Escotet;Rev. Esp. Pedagog.,1990

3. Relación de la gestión del conocimiento con la gestión académica de las universidades;Lovato;Rev. Investig. Neg.,2020

4. Dificultades de regulación emocional e intolerancia a la incertidumbre en estudiantes universitarios;Zamora;Quad. Psicol.,2020

5. Romero, R., Abba, M.J., and Taborga, A.M. (2015). Las Políticas Públicas en la Educación Superior Argentina. Análisis Comparativo de la Internacionalización Universitaria Durante los Períodos 1990–2002 y 2003–2011, En V Congreso Nacional e Internacional de Estudios Comparados en Educación.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3