Comparative Study of the Quality of Life and Coping Strategies in Oncology Patients

Author:

Meneguin Silmara1ORCID,Alves Izadora Gama1,Camargo Heloiza Thais Felipe1,Pollo Camila Fernandes1ORCID,Segalla Amanda Vitoria Zorzi1,de Oliveira Cesar2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University, São Paulo 18618-970, Brazil

2. Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK

Abstract

Background: Despite the current data on morbidity and mortality, a growing number of patients with a diagnosis of cancer survive due to an early diagnosis and advances in treatment modalities. This study aimed to compare the quality of life and coping strategies in three groups of patients with cancer and identify associated clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: A comparative study was conducted with outpatients at a public hospital in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The 300 participants were assigned to three groups: patients in palliative care (Group A), patients in post-treatment follow-up with no evidence of disease (Group B), and patients undergoing treatment for cancer (Group C). Data collection involved the use of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. No generic quality-of-life assessment tool was utilized, as it would not be able to appropriately evaluate the impact of the disease on the specific group of patients receiving palliative care. Results: Coping strategies were underused. Participants in the palliative care group had poorer quality of life, particularly in the psychological well-being and physical symptom domains. Age, currently undergoing treatment, and level of education were significantly associated with coping scores. Age, gender, income, and the absence of pharmacological pain control were independently associated with quality-of-life scores. Moreover, a positive association was found between coping and quality of life. Conclusion: Cancer patients in palliative care generally report a lower quality of life. However, male patients, those who did not rely on pharmacological pain control, and those with higher coping scores reported a better perception of their quality of life. This perception tended to decrease with age and income level. Patients currently undergoing treatment for the disease were more likely to use coping strategies. Patients with higher education and quality-of-life scores also had better coping scores. However, the use of coping strategies decreased with age.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference61 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO) (2023, October 08). Cancer: Key Facts. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer.

2. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries;Sung;CA A Cancer J. Clin.,2021

3. (2022, June 06). Ministério da Saúde A Vigilância de Câncer Fornece Os Subsídios Para Que Os Gestores Monitorem e Organizem as Ações Para o Controle de Câncer, Available online: https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/cancer/numeros/estimativa/introducao.

4. Global Surveillance of Trends in Cancer Survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): Analysis of Individual Records for 37 513 025 Patients Diagnosed with One of 18 Cancers from 322 Population-Based Registries in 71 Countries;Allemani;Lancet,2018

5. Amjad, M.T., Chidharla, A., and Kasi, A. (2023). StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3