Affiliation:
1. College of Intelligent System Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
Abstract
Accurate integrity risk evaluation is of significance in ensuring that aviation navigation applications satisfy the predefined integrity requirement. The integrity risk evaluation method over a specified exposure interval has been proposed in previous works for the development of advanced receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (ARAIM) (ARAIM technical subgroup reference airborne algorithm description document v4.1, 2022). However, this method typically relies on an underlying optimistic assumption that the satellite geometry remains constant throughout the exposure interval. The variation in satellite geometry due to potential satellite outages undermines the widely-used geometry constant assumption. Thus, we investigate the influence of satellite geometry variations throughout the exposure interval on the integrity performance by introducing a geometry-sensitive risk-evaluation model. The findings demonstrate that, under the nominal situation, the region where the ARAIM fails to meet predefined integrity requirement could expand by a maximum of 2.93% when accounting for satellite geometry variations. Furthermore, in the situation of a single satellite outage, this hazardous region has significantly expanded from 13.12% of the global coverage to 66.82%. Based on these findings, we recommend that the ARAIM should consider satellite outages as a critical factor in real-time integrity risk evaluation.
Funder
National Key Research and Development Program
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference28 articles.
1. WG-C Advanced RAIM Technical Subgroup (TSG) (2023, June 04). Advanced RAIM Technical Subgroup Reference Airborne Algorithm Description Document v4.1. 2022. Available online: https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=18254.
2. Sensitivity of advanced RAIM performance to mischaracterizations in integrity support message values;Lee;J. Navig.,2021
3. Integrity monitoring-based ratio test for GNSS integer ambiguity validation;Li;GPS Solut.,2016
4. BDS signal-in-space anomaly probability analysis over the last 6 years;Zhao;GPS Solut.,2021
5. Progress of global ARAIM availability of BDS-2/BDS-3 with TGD and ISB;Ma;Adv. Space Res.,2022