Immunogenicity of a Rotavirus VP8* Multivalent Subunit Vaccine in Mice
Author:
Cárcamo-Calvo Roberto12ORCID, Boscá-Sánchez Irene1ORCID, López-Navarro Sergi12, Navarro-Lleó Noemi1ORCID, Peña-Gil Nazaret12ORCID, Santiso-Bellón Cristina12ORCID, Buesa Javier12ORCID, Gozalbo-Rovira Roberto12ORCID, Rodríguez-Díaz Jesús12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibáñez 15, 46010 Valencia, Spain 2. Instituto de Investigación INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
Abstract
Rotavirus remains a significant public health threat, especially in low-income countries, where it is the leading cause of severe acute childhood gastroenteritis, contributing to over 128,500 deaths annually. Although the introduction of the Rotarix and RotaTeq vaccines in 2006 marked a milestone in reducing mortality rates, approximately 83,158 preventable deaths persisted, showing ongoing challenges in vaccine accessibility and effectiveness. To address these issues, a novel subcutaneous vaccine formulation targeting multiple rotavirus genotypes has been developed. This vaccine consists of nine VP8* proteins from nine distinct rotavirus genotypes and sub-genotypes (P[4], P[6], P[8]LI, P[8]LIII, P[8]LIV, P[9], P[11], P[14], and P[25]) expressed in E. coli. Two groups of mice were immunized either with a single immunogen, the VP8* from the rotavirus Wa strain (P[8]LI), or with the nonavalent formulation. Preliminary results from mouse immunization studies showed promising outcomes, eliciting antibody responses against six of the nine immunogens. Notably, significantly higher antibody titers against VP8* P[8]LI were observed in the group immunized with the nonavalent vaccine compared to mice specifically immunized against this genotype alone. Overall, the development of parenteral vaccines targeting multiple rotavirus genotypes represents a promising strategy in mitigating the global burden of rotavirus-related morbidity and mortality, offering new avenues for disease prevention and control.
Reference40 articles.
1. Havelaar, A.H., Kirk, M.D., Torgerson, P.R., Gibb, H.J., Hald, T., Lake, R.J., Praet, N., Bellinger, D.C., de Silva, N.R., and Gargouri, N. (2015). World Health Organization Global Estimates and Regional Comparisons of the Burden of Foodborne Disease in 2010. PLoS Med., 12. 2. Buesa, J., and Rodriguez-Díaz, J. (2016). The Molecular Virology of Enteric Viruses. Viruses Foods, 59–130. 3. Recommendations for the classification of group A rotaviruses using all 11 genomic RNA segments;Matthijnssens;Arch. Virol.,2008 4. Johne, R., Schilling-Loeffler, K., Ulrich, R.G., and Tausch, S.H. (2022). Whole Genome Sequence Analysis of a Prototype Strain of the Novel Putative Rotavirus Species L.. Viruses, 14. 5. RCWG (2024, May 15). Rotavirus Classification Working Group. Available online: https://rega.kuleuven.be/cev/viralmetagenomics/virus-classification/rcwg.
|
|