Vitamin D Supplementation and Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Anomalies—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Walker Karen Christina1,Thorsteinsdottir Fanney1ORCID,Christesen Henrik Thybo23,Hjortdal Vibeke Elisabeth4,Heitmann Berit Lilienthal156ORCID,Specht Ina Olmer16ORCID,Händel Mina Nicole17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Unit for Dietary Studies at The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Part of the Copenhagen University Hospital, The Capital Region, Nordre Fasanvej 57, Vej 8, Indgang 11, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark

2. Hans Christian Andersen Children’s Hospital, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark

3. Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark

4. Department Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

5. The Boden Initiative, The Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

6. The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark

7. Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark

Abstract

Maternal dietary factors have been suggested as possible contributing influences for congenital anomalies (CAs). We aimed to assess the association between vitamin D supplementation or vitamin D status (s-25OHD) during pregnancy and CAs in the offspring. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the three electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Included studies were critically appraised using appropriate tools (risk of bias 2, ROBINS-I). A protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42019127131). A meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including 3931 participants showed no effect of vitamin D supplementation on CAs, a relative risk of 0.76 (95% CI 0.45; 1.30), with moderate certainty in the effect estimates by GRADE assessment. Of the nine identified observational studies, six were excluded due to a critical risk of bias in accordance with ROBINS-I. Among the included observational studies, two studies found no association, whereas one case-control study identified an association between s-25OHD < 20 nmol/L and neural tube defects, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.34 (95% CI: 1.07; 5.07). Interpretation of the results should be cautious given the low prevalence of CAs, RCTs with onset of supplementation after organogenesis, and low-quality observational studies.

Funder

Danish Children’s Heart Foundation

The Oak Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Food Science,Nutrition and Dietetics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3