Affiliation:
1. University Institute of Environmental Studies and Natural Resources (i-UNAT), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
2. Department of Biology, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy
3. Oceanography and Global Change Institute (IOCAG), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
Abstract
This study deals with the effect of effluent recirculation (ER) on the pollutant removal efficacy of a full-scale, hybrid treatment system composed of a macrophyte pond and a horizontal flow constructed wetland. The average removals of 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), turbidity, total N (TN), ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N), total phosphorus (TP), sulfates, E. coli and Total coliforms (TC) for the years 2017–2018 (no recirculation), 2019 (50% recirculation) and 2021 (100% recirculation) were compared. Results show a general improvement of the effluent with ER. Removals for 0%, 50% and 100% ER, respectively, were: 59%, 61% and 66% for COD; 90%, 96% and 96% for BOD; 94%, 94% and 99% for TSS; 33%, 40% and 67% for TN; 22%, 30% and 55% for NH4-N; 92%, 98% and 96% for sulfates; 99.6%, 99.7% and 99.9% for E. coli; and 99.5%, 99.7% and 9.9% for TC. No clear effect was observed on the removal of TP and dissolved PO4-P, which were very low. 50% ER improved turbidity removal from 88% to 91%, but 100% ER provided worse results. The removal of NH4-N and TN significantly improved with 100% ER. This indicates that ER can be a simple, economic, and feasible way to upgrade the performance of full-scale natural wastewater treatment systems.
Funder
Fundación CajaCanarias
Fundación Bancaria “La Caixa”
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference43 articles.
1. Modelling water scarcity and droughts for policy adaptation to climate change in arid and semiarid regions;Kahil;J. Hydrol.,2015
2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC.
3. Developing a methodology to recover the cost of wastewater reuse: A proposal based on the polluter pays principle;Antonova;Util. Policy,2020
4. DEPURANAT Gestion sostenible del agua residual en los entornos rurales;Toscon;Rincones Atlántico,2005
5. Water sustainability using pond-in-pond wastewater treatment system: Case studies;Adhikari;J. Water Process Eng.,2020
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献