Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the ethical challenges in experimental drug use during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, using Germany as a case study. In Germany uniform ethical guidelines were available early on nationwide, which was considered as desirable by other states to reduce uncertainties and convey a message of unity. The purpose of this ethical analysis is to assist the preparation of future guidelines on the use of medicines during public health emergencies. The use of hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir and COVID-19 convalescent plasma in clinical settings was analyzed from the perspective of the ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, justice and autonomy. We observed that drug safety and drug distribution during the pandemic affects all four ethical principles. We therefore recommend to establish ethical guidelines (i) to discuss experimental treatment options with patients from all population groups who are in urgent need, (ii) to facilitate the recording of patient reactions to drugs in off-label use, (iii) to expand inclusion criteria for clinical studies to avoid missing potentially negative effects on excluded groups, and (iv) to maintain sufficient access to repurposed drugs for patients with prior conditions.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference69 articles.
1. Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19
2. Saving the most lives—A comparison of European triage guidelines in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic
3. Wie Soll der Zugang zu Einem COVID-19-Impfstoff Geregelt Werden?;Ethikrat,2021
4. Hinweise zu COVID-19
https://www.akek.de/aktuelle-hinweise/covid-19/
5. Policy Brief: Ethical Aspects of Pandemic Public Policy-Making under Uncertainty
https://www.public-health-covid19.de/images/2021/Ergebnisse/PB_uncertainty_pandemic_olicy_6Jan2021.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献