Abstract
According to the United Nations, 70% of the world’s population will live in cities by 2050, increasing the proliferation of areas of social exclusion and thus polarization and segregation. The establishment of multidimensional measures seeks to identify such situations of social exclusion to inform social policies and interventions. However, some concerns emerge: Are these measures catching the needs of people living in particularly disadvantages areas? Do they offer a human-centred approach or a territorial focus? Is the multidimensionality of such measures reflecting nonmaterial aspects such as health, access to liveable environments or political participation? To analyse how the scientific literature is addressing the measurement of social exclusion to tackle such urban challenges, a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed in the Web of Science database. After screening following the inclusion criteria, 28 studies were identified that analysed systems of indicators that multidimensionally examined social exclusion at the individual and/or family level in urban contexts. Despite studies being eminently limited to some Western countries, the results revealed a broad diversity. However, very few of them fully focused on the specific characteristics of marginalized urban areas, and most found serious difficulties in overcoming a material approach.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference52 articles.
1. Indicators of Social Exclusion and Inclusion: A Critical and Comparative Analysis of the Literature;Labonté,2011
2. The Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Social Exclusion;Levitas,2007
3. Evaluating contemporary social exclusion in Europe: a hierarchical latent class approach
4. Indicators and Targets for Social Inclusion in the European Union
5. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,2015
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献