Inequalities in Health: Methodological Approaches to Spatial Differentiation

Author:

Hübelová DanaORCID,Kuncová MartinaORCID,Vojáčková Hana,Coufalová Jitka,Kozumplíková AliceORCID,Lategan Francois StefanusORCID,Chromková Manea Beatrice-Elena

Abstract

The prevalence of inequalities in the general health position of communities can be assessed by using selected determinants. The aims of this article are three-fold: (1) to apply a comprehensive approach to the assessment of inequalities in the general health position of communities, (2) to determine the spatial differentiation of determinants, and (3) to present selected assessment methods and their impact on the results. To present a quantitative assessment of these inequalities in health status in communities, a composite indicator (Health Index) was developed. This Health Index is composed of 8 areas of evaluation and 60 indicators which include, amongst others, determinants of health status and healthcare at district level (LAU 1) in the Czech Republic. The data are evaluated using multicriteria decision-making methods (the WSA and TOPSIS methods). Findings suggest that, when all eight domains are assigned the same weight of one, the spatial differentiation among the districts is similar when using both methods. If different weightings are assigned to the districts, changes occur in both the index values and the rankings of the analyzed districts. For example, the allocation of weightings in both methods results in a rearrangement of the ranking of districts for which the Health Index is around the average.

Funder

TECHNOLOGY AGENCY OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC in the Program ÉTA

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference84 articles.

1. Health Inequalities in the EU. Final Report of a Consortium,2013

2. What Is Health Equity? And What Difference Does a Definition Make?;Braveman,2017

3. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health,2010

4. What If We Were Equal? A Comparison Of The Black-White Mortality Gap In 1960 And 2000

5. Spatialized composite indices to evaluate environmental health inequalities: Meeting the challenge of selecting relevant variables

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3